You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

@MattMastodon @AlexisFR @Wirrvogel

The optimum imho is:

  1. The bulk of the generation from wind and solar, and nuclear for 15% - 20% base load. Also some Geothermal where cheap but it’s potential is small.

  2. Grids improved to cover local and intermediate renewable generation, and extended to facilitate import/export.

  3. Variable electricity pricing for demand shifting.

The result is vastly reduced need for storage, probably batteries used intelligently in a hierarchy of grid and home, compared to the naïve “just build wind and solar and batteries.”

Then add in:

  1. A 90% transition from personal cars to free green public transport (#FGPT), taxis, e-bikes, bicycles, and walking.

This all needs no new technology (although for nuclear there are several advances not yet used at scale: molten salt, small, modular, U238, thorium), it needs a fraction of the rare earths, and delivers a huge in reduction steel production courtesy of car recycling.

#Energy #Renewables #ClimateCrisis #Climate #Nuclear

[P.S. Dams damage eco-systems so I’m not in favour of more hydro generation, and pumped hydro storage needs the spare water too.

Biomass not “net zero” and obviously not “zero” which we actually need. It’s just more carbon burning plus extra pollution from the agriculture and other products of combustion. It increases land use, and at present the industry is full of corruption with trees being burned sometimes alongside shredded car tyres… and subsidised!]

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

nuclear uses lots of energy to build. Even windmills use fibreglass.

It may be more expensive to build, but not because it’s more energy intensive. Especially when you look at capacity. It is by far the most efficient source, requiring much less material and energy per generation capacity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@Claidheamh

That’s a big claim, and having watched a #nuclear power station being built I struggle to agree. Especially if you look at full life cycle from mining uranium to disposal.

Also most of the work with a #windmill is establishing the site. Once done repairs and upgrades are cheap.

And #renewables are quick. Chuck a spare at it and you’ll have useful energy in a few months. The main problem in the UK is government obstructing them.

And they’re still being built.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.de

Create post

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators