I for one have stopped posting any content to lemmy.ml communities.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
134 points
*

Here’s a list of a few .ml communities and potential replacements:

Side note the main issue with .ml is transparency. It’s fine if the admins of an instance implement whatever rules they want in their instance; however, once they start enforcing hidden rules disguised as violations of the listed rules, they’re being liars and treating the users as stupid things to be herded, not as human beings.

EDIT: as people noticed I’m not including .world comms to not encourage even further concentration of activity into the largest instance. Decentralisation is important. Also I’m adding stuff that you guys suggest.

* for specialised memes, as the category is rather large:

permalink
report
reply
74 points
*

I had the audacity to say that the deaths of Tiannanmen’s Square were inexcusable, no matter who started the violence, and my comment was removed under instance rule 1 (bigotry)… like wat 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Ah, typical lemmy.ml . They have a hard time understanding that you can support a certain ideology without necessarily turning a blind eye to everything that people claim to be doing for the sake of said ideology, or that any criticism against their actions is automatically false.

I remember you, by the way. You were already an old Lemmy user when I joined in, 3y ago!

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

My OG account is 6 years old 👴

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I dared to say that the illegal, violent invasion of the foreign nation of Ukraine was bad. Turns out NATO made them do that, as well as rape and torture all those people and steal the children. Who knew… 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The irony of so-called Marxist-Leninists refusing to be self-critical…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_and_self-criticism_(Marxism–Leninism)

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

The .ml transparency thing is a symptom, not a root cause. The admins like and even participate in the .ml rhetoric. The rules ambiguity is intentional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

We could argue that the root cause is that .ml admins pretending that their instance’s target audience is wider than it actually is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Their target audience is Westerner suckers gullible enough to have their opinions manipulated

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Do they though?

I was rejected when I first tried to sign up (when I was entirely new to lemmy) and they’re turning at least one user away now

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s a great advertisement for communism that’s for sure. They haven’t even gotten real power and it already resembles the worst of what communism offers. They’re a bunch of wannabe Ceausescu’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

the main issue with .ml is transparency authoritarian propaganda with full-throated support from the admins

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

If they were banning people for shit posting on a communism community I wouldn’t have a problem. Its when you get removed banned from all communities because you said you don’t like there crappy memes

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Or even if they had an instance-wide rule saying “don’t criticise Russia or China here”. It’s fine as long as the rules are clear.

But no, instead they libel the users criticising either, claiming that they violated rule #1 (TL;DR “no bigots”). Even when the criticism is clearly against the government.

And then you get a bunch of 11yos eating that ban message for breakfast, because they’re full of gullibleness and don’t get the purpose of this utterance dumb fucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Tbf, that admin telling someone to kill themselves wasn’t exactly a high mark for their ethics imho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That rule becomes clear very quickly when you’re familiar with Lemmy. (Unless you’re defederated from .ml.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

!asklemmy@lemmy.world has over 70 times as many subscribers as the other two asklemmy communities combined.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I’m avoiding linking lemmy.world instances. We shouldn’t put even more eggs in that basket, you know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

But maybe we shouldn’t throw out the few eggs Lemmy does have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

memes:

and for more specialized memes:

world news: I realize you’re avoiding lemmy.world to promote decentralization which is why you’re listing !news@beehaw.org, but note that beehaw defederated itself from lemmy.world and from several others?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Is femcel memes ironic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Their sidebar has a longish explanation of where they’re coming from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve added all of them to the list, thanks!

Regarding !news@beehaw.org, now there’s an alternative there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Mmhmm, mmhmm - secret laws, secret trials - definitely not authoritarian behavior at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
6 points

Added to the list - thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

An odd choice on their part is dessalines upvoting every comment that corresponds to a removal or ban. Feels almost as though they’ve Jerry-rigged their moderation code to an extreme degree in order to keep up with the day job levels of moderation they’re doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I suggest you add !globalnews@lemmy.zip to the news section. Beehaw isn’t accessible to people on instances they’ve defederated from or instances that have defederated them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Hello! That’s a very lovely formatted table with links, however, clicking on them does nothing for me whilst clicking on links otherwise in the replies does take me to the respective communities. I don’t know if it’s just me though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That’s weird - are you accessing lemmy through a browser, or some app?

Check if it works here: !funny@sh.itjust.works

If it does then it’s the table interacting weirdly with the links, I can fix it by removing the table.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fwiw all the links work fine for me from both PieFed and Lemmy.World base web UI even without an account. So it must be an app issue, and all the “standard” methods of access work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hey. Hey, people. Just selecting each link and subscribing will vastly improve your experience here in the fediverse. Do it now, before you forget!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

It’s fine if the admins of an instance implement whatever rules they want in their instance; however, once they start enforcing hidden rules disguised as violations of the listed rules, they’re being liars and treating the users as stupid things to be herded, not as human beings.

I see a lot more of that on .world communities, specifically the news and political memes communities will remove comments for “misinformation” even if you’re citing academic works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

will remove comments for “misinformation”

As they should

even if you’re citing academic works.

I’ve seen the “academic works” y’all cite, blog posts, YT videos, random books and retracted studies

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

random books

So if we’re not allowed to cite books, what exactly do you want?

blog posts, YT videos, and retracted studies

Who is citing those? I’ve had liberals link hour long youtube essays and I just say “lol I’m not going to read that”, but I’ve not noticed anyone on the left doing that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

If the .world admins are doing it too, it’s also bad. Thankfully I didn’t list a single .world community, although for another reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Citing some random paper doesn’t make what your saying not disinformation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

From a formal logic perspective, your statement is true. But in real life, the more important distinction is not between “true” and “false”, but between “purposefully deceptive and ungenuine disinformation” versus “outspoken dissenting viewpoint”. And that is one that people are really bad at telling the difference between, especially if the viewpoint in particular is one that they hold very strongly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Classically lemmy.world.

“Your peer reviewed academic studies are misinformation, do you not read the news ?”

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@lemmy.world

Create post

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 66K

    Comments