You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points
*

You find the tattoos distasteful for a reason of your own. I share such a reason, but it’s your own. Therefore you find the display graffiti-like: a blight on the visual landscape (in that interpretation of grafatti)

Edit The significance of Nazi iconography being distasteful is an easy one, and that’s why it was used as an alternative display to prove the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’ve already stated that I do not find the tattoos themselves distasteful. It’s the meaning behind them.

We’re assuming that the owner of the building didn’t do that themselves, but if they did it’s not my problem.

I’ve already stated elsewhere that the real difference between a women getting her body tattooed and a building getting tagged is one consented and the building owner(presumably) didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Consent is not part of the point being made. The woman, the Nazi dude, whatever. It’s the perceived appeal. You identified you have no issue with the art of the woman, but do with the art of the man. That’s the point. Don’t conflate into other topics, of course the woman is free to choose her art, even a swastika. The point is the others perception of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I disagree. The Consent is the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The Right Can't Meme

!therightcantmeme@midwest.social

Create post

About

This community is about making fun of dumb right wing memes. Here you will find some of the cringiest memes that the right has ever posted on the internet.

Rules

  1. All posts must be memes containing right wing cringe

  2. No unrelated content

  3. No bigotry

  4. Spammers and Trolls will be instantly banned. No Exceptions.

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!leftism@lemmy.world

!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 10

    Monthly active users

  • 148

    Posts

  • 2.9K

    Comments