NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft has experienced a computer glitch that’s causing a bit of a communication breakdown between the 46-year-old probe and its mission team on Earth.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
313 points

For those who didn’t read the article, voyager 1 is still sending and transmitting data. It’s stuck in a loop sending the same packets to Earth on repeat but it is receiving commands just fine. It’s not completely dark.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I wonder if it’s struggling with Parity Checks?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How do we know that it’s receiving commands fine? I am assuming pinging Voyager 1 might take a while.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It takes 20+ hours so since the announcement and now they could have send a command and gotten a response

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It takes 45 hours and that’s a good question.

Perhaps there are multiple distinct channels with one for command responses and another for scientific data?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Are we sure it isn’t YouTube trying to insert an ad?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This is the dumbest thing I’ve read today. You got a giggle out of me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ideally it was an update issue and it’s fixable. However I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a hardware failure due to radiation or something similar. That said, Voyager1 has power only until 2025 or so, since RTGs are designed to last that much. So even if the issue is fixed, its life will only expand by few years. Also, the fact it relies on nuclear power means none of the new stuff will last as long since they stopped using them some time ago due to fear from nuclear energy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

RTGs are still used for outer solar system missions. Not enough light for solar panels. Hell, even the Perseverance Mars rover, which was launched in 2020, has an RTG.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hm, didn’t know about those. Good to hear. RTGs are such a great technology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

God forbid we pollute the far reaches of space with radiation. (sic.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Am thinking people were mostly worried if rocket explodes during liftoff. Then again people also are completely clueless about radiation in general, especially smokers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

So the title did its job which is you understand nothing until you enter their site, drive traffic, display ads, and possibly collect your data in the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ads are a shitty part of the internet experience, but what exactly is your point here…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

My point is the title in journalism went from a summary of the story to a confusing false statement that might give you a hint of what the story is about.

In this story the title is clearly saying Voyager has stopped communicating with Earth which is false.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

possibly collect your data in the process

Nooo they respect your privacy just share your stuff with 967 of their partners

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good because I drew the line at 969

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Sure and Lemmy did its work by letting me and others relay the info. I hate ads as much as the next guy, especially targeted ads, but the internet is free and I don’t pay CNN a dime so I’ll take the hit for you this time. Next time, you click the clickbait and fill us in ☺️

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points

That’s fantastic, that means all they have to do is reset some components and it should restore functionality. I say should, it’s still a scary thing to turn on/off components om a satellite bcz you aren’t guaranteed they’ll come on. Nasa people usually prefer soft resets to hard resets of components, but we’ll see what happens.

One of the satellites I worked on had to have a software update to do a soft reset of a component every time it tried to write certain data. It was really scary bcz we thought we had lost one of our redundancies right after launch, which would have sucked.

But, we didn’t. Anyway, just wanted to give a little bit of insight into what the FOT might be thinking about while they’re trying to recover the satellite to nominal state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Yeah I got very sad when I saw the headline and breathed a huge sigh of relief. Voyager 1’s death will be far sadder than most public figures. Maybe any.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I don’t know if I would consider Voyager to be ‘dead’ if it stops transmitting.

If I put a message in a bottle, with a blinky light on it, then throw it into the ocean, the message is still there even if the blinky light goes out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Wait till it returns as V’ger

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Same, for a moment I was really concerned. Voyager is like a lifetime achievement for humanity at this point. When it stops communicating its going to be a big loss for the scientific community, and population as a whole. I’m not looking forward to hearing about its loss of functionality in the next decade or so.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 551K

    Comments