You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

If the data has to be paid for, openAI will gladly do it with a smile on their face. It guarantees them a monopoly and ownership of the economy.

Paying more but having no competition except google is a good deal for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Eh, the issue is lots of people wouldn’t be willing to sell tho.

Like, you think an author wants the chatbot to read their collected works and use that? Regardless of if it’s quoting full texts or “creating” text in their style.

No author is going to want that.

And if it’s up to publishers, they likely won’t either. Why take one small payday if that could potentially lead to loss of sales a few years down the row.

It’s not like the people making the chatbits just need to buy a retail copy of the text to be in the legal clear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The publisher’s will absolutely sell imo. They just publish, the book will be worth the same with or without the help of AI to write it.

I guess there is a possibility that people start replacing bought books with personalized book llm outputs but that strikes me as unlikely.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 556K

    Comments