You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

It wasn’t though, even for them. It made them dumber and their society less prosperous and resilient. The North didn’t win because they were morally in the right (they were), but because slavery is inherently less productive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It made the southern states more prosperous… IF you exclude black people from the definition of people, which is what slavery did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

IF you exclude black people and also the majority of white people (i.e. everybody who wasn’t a member of the planter class), you mean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

There’s certainly debate about that. And that’s the exact discussion you want to see occuring as that’s what teaches critical thinking.

So yes, you should be discussing the beneficial aspects of slavery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Pretty sure the south lost because of the 3:1 soldier advantage, and besides Lee the North had all the best military leaders and experience. Some say the industrial output of the north mattered more, but truth is the south had plenty of weapons but no people to use them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@midwest.social

Create post

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 8.5K

    Comments