122

Which TLDs are too risky for hosting?

posted
*
by
Avatar
miles@lemm.ee
in
Avatar
fediverse@lemmy.world
54 comments
hidereport

With several Lemmy instances using the .ml TLD I’ve seen people mention others being risky as well. Which should be avoided?

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
slugworth@lemmy.world
6 points

I love my Synology NAS. It’s the DS920+. I’ve had it for a couple years. I upgraded the memory to 8 GB and use Portainer for a docket UI. I have 24 containers running on my NAS now, including sab, radarr, sonarr, deluge, joplin, piped/hyperpipe, youtubedl, jellyfin, pihole, and lemmy. 8gb of memory and about 45% used. Plex also runs as a native DSM package.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
oleorun@lemmy.fan
4 points

I’ve got the DS923+. It’s replacing a very old but very functional QNAP that I’ve had for years. Alas, QTS or whatever the OS is called is slow and clunky and after using our DS920+ at work I made the decision to get a Synology.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse

!fediverse@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it’s related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

  • Posts must be on topic.
  • Be respectful of others.
  • Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
  • Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

Community stats

  • 5.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 64K

    Comments

Community moderators