256 points
*

Because he IS too old. Biden did the right thing. Selflessly put the country before himself and listened to his party. I don’t think Trump would ever have enough morals or integrity to do that in a million years unfortunately. So we’ll have to beat the old loon and his band of circus freaks at the polls, again.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Biden was never supposed to run for a second term, and then dragged his feet until the very last minute. The selfless thing would’ve been to step aside for someone younger before the race began

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah, he fucked over everyone by participating in the primaries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

Not that I’m suggesting that this was intentional or that he did right to wait, but there are a few upsides. Trump and the Republicans were fully prepared and frothing to take on that blubbering old man from that last debate, but now they’re actually going to make a case for Trump over a (hopefully) real contender. And many Democrat voters went from feeling defeated and apathetic, potentially enough to not even bother voting, to being charged with a second chance and a (again, hopefully) more exciting candidate to support. If Biden had declared his intention not to run again before the primaries, the Republicans would have had much longer to prepare and pick apart someone who wasn’t such an easy target, and Dems would have been infighting over the nuances of a dozen candidates and pissed off at each other. And, if Harris is the presumptive nomination, for better or worse, the knee jerk reaction from the Right will probably be to play up the racist and sexist angles, which should drive moderates away from the right, not away from Harris.

It’s all conjecture, but I only see this as a net positive compared to where we were yesterday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

agreed, never should have tried for the second bite.

however… dems now have an opportunity to own the news cycle from here until the election. if they do even a halfway decent job, we start trending from “narrow loss” -> “political landslide”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

… Unlike Johnson, who didn’t. And that worked out well for president Humphries in '68.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I think most people had no idea he was significantly declining, hence the astonishment at the debate. And some people around him seem to have been encouraging the denial (or worse). I’m unclear if he was doing better many months ago before primaries.

I can’t imagine how insulated and reliant on advisors and other employees the president becomes. Quickly surrounded by people who have no interest in being the bearer of bad news. Probably akin to billionaires, and we see what they mutate into (some kind of Musk-like creature).

I’m so relieved that Biden was able to come to this painful decision, even if it was late. On the bright side, at least there’s less time for the GOP to smear the new nominee. And no more televised convention for them to host the lies for free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

There was a significant effort to hide Biden’s disability. The upper echelons in the Dem party have a lot to answer for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Still far more selfless than Trump though. I’m sure we can absolutely agree there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I guess? When trump is the bar, it’s pretty easy to come out on top

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Everyone can look like a genius with hindsight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And everyone should have foreseen the age problem with Biden running a second term…

I think most will agree, dnc should have started pushing another candidate the week after jan6.

Biden himself ran on being one term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In 2019.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

He only planned to serve one term? I’m sure you have a source for that…?

UPDATE: I was wrong, they have a source!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

lol editing to defend yourself before anyone responds? I can’t even downvote buddy.

Yeah I was mistaken, I checked and it seems like if anyone said that it was the campaign and not Biden himself.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/11/biden-single-term-082129

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Anyways…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I honestly wonder if it was always the plan to waste the GOPs money on a campaign against Biden up until the nomination was locked in. Biden did say he’d be a 1 term president after all. The move makes Biden come off as the better person, makes room for a (slightly) younger, far more capable and progressive candidate, and wasted a ton of the GOPs effort and money. I’m truly hopeful that not only will Harris win, but due to all the shit slinging going on in the house and Senate, the left wins back a ton of seats making it so Harris’s term is as effective as possible. I’m 90% sure most seats in the house are up for grabs this coming vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
133 points

Trump doesn’t care about the responsibility of being president. He likes the power and prestige of it.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

But I don’t want real power, because with real power comes real responsibility, and I don’t want any of that shit.

I just want the money.

And the illusion of power.

And puss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I nominate Shane Gillis as Trump for Kamala’s VP pick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I call my God hole.

And you wanna fill it with puss?

Yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Not just that, this is his ticket to stop all the criminal trials.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

He does, but only because it’s either be President or go to jail

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Also, republicans don’t care about being called out for their bullshit

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

“The first party to retire its 80-year old candidate is going to be the one who wins this election.”

— Nikki Haley, in January.

BTW, I think it would be good for Dems to always call Trump 80. It will be a good irritation for Republicans

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I’ve been getting down voted for saying it for a year…

But yeah, trump doesn’t stand a fucking chance now. Also, this is probably the only way to get people excited about Kamala.

2028 better be a real primary or we just kicked the can down the road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You know it will probably be either the Harris reelection effort, or no election due to complications from Trumpitis

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Harris against Trump Jr. and they will claim Harris is too old.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Gotta keep the pressure up.

Make her promise to an open and fair 2028 primary before the 2024 election.

None of this wishwashy shit where everyone close to Biden promise it’s a one turn thing, but the candidate doesn’t understand how shitty of a candidate they are.

Kamala’s gonna win because she’s not trump. Not because she’s what Dem voters want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Harris still has a lot of animosity towards her from her time as a prosecutor, but I’m thinking she’s at least a better candidate than biden. The expected republican attacks of “she’s black” and “she’s a woman” probably won’t sway anyone as much as “Joe Biden personally shoots Palestinian kids.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

She’ll be fine.

Moderates like her already, and as someone who’s had to vote Hillary and Joe in the last two elections…

It’s easier for progressives to hold their nose when they have the benefit of the doubt about how bad the candidate is.

We’re fucking fighting fascism bro, her being a DA might even be a good thing if she’s actually down to fight fascists. Don’t forget before McCarthyism we had capitalists allying with communists to fight fascism.

Hell, if she pulls a “I know the system, I know it needs fixed, and I look forward to being president so it can be fixed” would guarantee she’s the next prez.

It doesn’t take much, we’rre just coming off the two worst Dem candidates in modern history, and still got a trump hangover from his term. So Kamala would have to really fuck shit up to lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ughhh I am NOT looking forward to the racist pieces of shit who will go on and on now about “SEE! Democrats won’t even let you pick a candidate, they have to shove their DEI applicant down our throats!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I could see how nominating Harris this way could run people the wrong way, and both she and the DNC should vow to run a full and fair primary for the 2028 Presidential Elections. As in, treating Harris as if that would be the end of her second term (but still allowing her to run for nomination).

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Have we seen his birth certificate?! Maybe he actually is 80…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Many people are saying it - Is Trump too old for the Presidency? I hear it all the time from fine folks. Shouldn’t we answer these folks? All we need to see if the birth certificate. Maybe Trump is younger then actually says. We don’t know. Many people asking questions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The Nikki Haley PAC donated to Harris as soon as it was announced

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just go with 92, it’s 45+47, and start marking up the 45-47 signs with a plus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

He’s old as fuck and shits his diapers on stage

permalink
report
reply
14 points

He walks around with a frame when there aren’t any cameras.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

Yeah, these ads almost write themselves. Show clips of right-wingers describing Biden as old and senile, then splice in clips of Trump rambling incoherently. The entire Trump campaign has been built around attacking Biden, so there will probably be a lot of tangential benefits of switching to Harris.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Ooof, I hadn’t even thought about this possibility! They could splice up some absolutely wild ads of Trump surrogates appearing to criticize Trump for being too old and senile!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, they would probably have to make it clear that they were originally talking about Biden, otherwise I think that’s fraud, but basically how I would do it.

Narrator: What did some [some Republican chud] think about Biden?

Republican Chud: You can’t have a senile, 80 year old grandpa leading the country!

-smash-cut to Trump-

Trump: Now all I know about magnets is this, give me a glass of water, let me drop it on the magnets, that’s the end of the magnets. Why didn’t they use John Deere? Why didn’t they bring in the John Deere people? Do you like John Deere? I like John Deere.

Narrator: Sounds like [some Republican chud] was right!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 468K

    Comments