Susan Horton had been a stay-at-home mom for almost 20 years, and now—pregnant with her fifth child—she felt a hard-won confidence in herself as a mother.

Then she ate a salad from Costco.

Horton didn’t realize that she would be drug-tested before her child’s birth. Or that the poppy seeds in her salad could trigger a positive result on a urine drug screen, the quick test that hospitals often use to check pregnant patients for illicit drugs. Many common foods and medications—from antacids to blood pressure and cold medicines—can prompt erroneous results.

If Horton had been tested under different circumstances—for example, if she was a government employee and required to be tested as part of her job—she would have been entitled to a more advanced test and to a review from a specially trained doctor to confirm the initial result.

156 points

And let me guess, she paid for the privilege of being forced to stay 5 days and having her baby taken away from her? Unless she’s got amazing insurance?

Honestly, I’m so glad to live somewhere with public health care.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Yes. However, she will get a payout in the end

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

She will, but many MANY more won’t be so privileged.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Tbf I don’t think she wants a payout … she just wants her kid back (and maybe have the testing protocols updated to follow the science instead of the stupidity).

permalink
report
parent
reply
134 points
*
90 points

There was even a Mythbuster episode where they confirmed it. IIRC, their test popped reliably after two bagels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Yeah it was a good episode. They were blown away.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The last thing I saw about this very topic had mentioned that most newer tests did not have this false positive issue, but many older tests did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I remember myth busters testing this

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Also that Seinfeld episode.

permalink
report
parent
reply
130 points

A lot of this article is about drug testing, but this also should remind people how much chaos one shitty, or overworked, nurse can cause.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

Omg yes! I perform drug testing and I’ve had instances where nurses called CPS before we could give them a confirmation result causing mayhem for all involved. It makes me want to scream whenever I see screening tests used as evidence against people. Any hospital or government agency making those kinds of decisions based on a screen should be sued to high hell. Also fun fact really high levels of Benadryl will cause you to pop positive for PCP on most drug screens. I’ve had to talk a handful of pediatricians down about that over the years too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I had a fun event a year ago where I woke up in a Covid ward after surgery because a nurse saw antibodies on a pre-surgery Covid test.

I had covid about a month before, that’s why I still had detectable antibodies. The doctors all knew that. That’s why they admitted me and performed the procedure.

You should have to clear something past an actual doctor if some things are going to get escalated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I honestly thought that was the case this entire time

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*

I’m sorry but anyone who thinks people with thc in their urine are less valuable than people that don’t, is a worthless piece of human trash themselves. It’s appalling that this is even a thing but more so how many people actually support it staying the way it is.

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*

I was listening to a podcast today or yesterday talking about huge recruiting shortfalls in 3 of 4 military branches in the US. The biggest factor was that the available pool of recruits are 75% ineligible for a variety of reasons, but the biggest factor is past/current drug use. The most common drug: cannabis. Even if someone has used it only once, even if they just tried it, they are ineligible for military service.

It seems pretty foolish, in the biggest recruitment shortfall in American history, to discount your largest possible pool of recruits just because they might’ve smoked a doobie once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Even if someone has used it only once, even if they just tried it, they are ineligible for military service.

Well that’s just false. You’ll get denied if you pop hot on a drug test at MEPS, but they don’t tend to care if you’ve smoked in the past, except as a barometer for if you’ll smoke in the future. And, like almost everything else in the DoD, there’s a waiver form you can fill out for it too

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Can confirm. I signed said waiver. I told them that yeah, I smoke weed, but if my job requires me to be clean, I’m clean. Except Adderall. They gave me 30 days to get clean, sent me to MEPS and made me a Nuke. Then nuke school wouldn’t let me leave and they made me an officer and an instructor.

I joined the Navy to see the world, ffs. I’d already seen South Carolina :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Also confirmed, signed a waiver and still went to a top secret A-school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So as someone who’s in his mid 20s and chops more grass than a lawnmower, what kind of experience would I have trying to enlist?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

I hope every employer that continues enforcing thc testing in the workplace collaspes. Many of them are already on the brink. I just want to have a normal life and still get to smoke weed sometimes. All I know is that I will continue working towards that goal until I succeed, deal with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How would they know though? I know it stays in your system for a couple of weeks but not for months or years so you could just lie on the application form.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

She tested positive for heroin, not THC. If she was actually actually heroin, child protective services involvement would absolutely be warranted.

The issue here is the erroneous test and complete failure on the part of the hospital to confirm its results

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

She tested positive for opiates, not heroin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes, heroin is an opiate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t think poppy seeds make you test positive for THC.

Not that it really matters but it’s a bit of a stronger drug that it emulates

permalink
report
parent
reply
-52 points

Counterpoint: Walked my dogs past a Gradeschool (5-13yo) during the hustle and bustle of the first morning of class. Smacked in the face at 8:30am with the stench of weed.

Pillars of the community. No doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

I don’t understand how 13-year olds smoking weed is a counterpoint to the other comment…

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Looking that his response can be boiled down, “I don’t need to explain myself” I think they can be safely ignored

permalink
report
parent
reply
-47 points

I wouldn’t expect you to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Hack writing but yeah, this is possible and I’m surprised there isn’t a better test.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I think there is a better test. The cheap and fast one is tricked though. The fact they didn’t do a more advanced test before taking her child is pretty fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments