-20 points
*

I’ll never understand why anyone thought the guy to clean up after Trump’s first term was an over 80 year old moderate who’s views on presidential powers boils down to:

I believe the president should be powerless, which apparently means as president I can’t limit the next presidents power

We need someone to fight fascism and we got a geriatric pacifist who spent his whole campaign lying about what he was prepared to do…

And then when he dropped out last minute we ran his VP who kept saying she agreed with him 100% and wouldnt have changed anything over the last four years, despite most of what he “tried” never making it I to the planning stages or getting struck down before implementation.

Biden failed and Kamala told voters she was fine with that and then acted shocked when that’s not what voters wanted.

Voters want someone who will fight for them, not “aww shucks, vote for me again and we’ll try the same shit”.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Amazing. You read an article about how shitty trump is and you immediately blame Democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

Amazing. You read a comment about how Trump is a genuine threat that needs real opposition rather than a Democratic party that looks to compromise with that threat and you immediately decide to kiss the asses of the party that repeatedly fails to protect us.

Edit: The Democratic Party has learned nothing from 2016, they learned the wrong lessons from 2020, and I worry they’ll learn nothing from this election. People critiquing the Democratic Party’s approach is not an endorsement of Trump. We want better opposition that actually fights for us. If all you want is to root for you team and ignore their flaws then we’re fucked.

You should be pushing the party to improve not shutting down any discussion of improving the parties platform or strategy. Trump got elected due to Democratic failures, not because people are discussing those failures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Haha, if you think I have a “team”, youre fucking cooked.

I’m calling a spade a spade. You want to avoid this? Vote for who is CLOSEST to what you want. Instead of waiting for Santa Claus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The democratic party is absolutely to blame for this damning historic loss. The last time the Republican won the popular vote was over 20 years ago and the fact the candidate that just pulled that off is the ultra divisive Donald Trump says more about the failure of the left than it does about the right. The majority of Americans don’t believe the Democrats can or will fight for them anymore and that’s a major issue. Joe Biden wasn’t able to effectively articulate his policies and the gaslighting us about his obvious mental acuity did nothing to build trust. I’m tired of hearing the Dems should pick a centrist candidate when it’s obvious they need to dump big money interests and fight for working people again. They need to run a left wing candidate that has the ability to clearly speak to and defend their well thought out policies. They need someone who we can trust to take action on office and not just give lip service our issues. Until then get ready to fail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s his whole schtick. Apparently trying and failing to hold Trump accountable is more immoral than supporting him and shielding him from him the consequences of his crimes. 🤷

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This is the new narrative. “I don’t share in the blame if people didn’t vote for Harris. All I did was constantly tell people not to vote for Harris.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Bernie would have been that person. I’m still upset about that.

I can’t think of anyone aggressive enough for the future. AOC maybe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

AOC is the best bet.

But whoever it is, the focus needs to be on increasing turnout from the left and not attempting to steal Republican voters by moving the whole party right.

Republican voters will always say if Dems agree with them they’ll vote D, but it’s always a lie and they’ll always vote R.

Just this way they still get what they want if they lose and they know it’ll help the Republican win.

Either the people running the DNC are so stupid they still haven’t noticed, or they’re in on the grift. Considering the same billionaires/corps donate to both parties, I’m not really it out.

But regardless of why they’re so bad at their job, we can’t afford to keep letting them run the literal only other option to fascism.

As John Oliver just said (paraphrased, but around 10:30 of latest episode):

If you wanted a centrist campaign that’s quiet on trans issues, tough on border, distances itself from Palestinians, talks a lot law and order and reaches out to Republicans…

That candidate existed, and she just lost.

She can’t have gone any further “center” and she performed horribly. Anyone saying we went to far left isn’t paying attention to reality, they’ll listening to billionaire’s talking heads on the TV.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A populist. That’s what the people crave.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Always have and always will.

It’s common sense that voters want someone who they think can and will help them.

Republicans lie about it and win elections. Dem politicians try to convince us populism is bad because it’s not what their donors want.

A little bit of me dies everytime a “moderate” conflates populism with evil.

Populism is a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of the common people and often position this group in opposition to a perceived elite group.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

They hate populism because they’re the political elite. They’re the ones already not helping the common American and instead helping the other wealthy people.

If the Dem party pivots to populism, it means replacing both the elected and non elected leaders of the Dem party. And they’re not going to do what’s best for the country but worst for them personally voluntarily, or they’d be populists already.

We need to either force them out or start a new party, and four years isn’t as much time as it seems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A little bit of me dies everytime a “moderate” conflates populism with evil.

conflate sure, but they’re not mutually exclusive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bernie party for the future. Whatever name it needs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That and electrolytes

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And they always should.

We are meant to be a democracy, a populist is literally a person who puts citizens issues ahead of others.

Bernie is a populist, populists are great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I wouldn’t exactly call Biden a pacifist…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I would, he’s an extreme pacifist to the point where figuratively if he saw a grown man beating a six year old to death in an alley he wouldn’t lift a finger to stop it.

He’d admonish it, tell them to stop, maybe even call them corncob.

But he wouldn’t use violence to save that childs life.

And obviously in this analogy Gaza is the child that can’t defend itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He’s literally sending weapons to the man beating the child and telling him where to hit him where it hurts most

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Uhhh …

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Meh, most of it will be challenged in court.

That’s one of the first things I noticed with his previous try; For all of Obamas flaws, it at least seemed that everything was thought through with lawyers in the loop to make sure the execitive orders had a reasonable chance of surviving a legal challenge.

And then this clown comes along and gives the impression that he handed someone a post-it that said “no moar muzleems!!!111one”

permalink
report
reply
2 points

That’s the thing about the massive lumbering behemoth that is “government”.

Despite anyone’s best efforts, actually changing shit is a slow, arduous, sometimes impossible process.

Not saying he won’t try, but he’ll be about as successful as making America fit his vision as Biden, Obama, Bushel, Clinton, … Etc were.

The other good news, is that historically, 100% of the time (except for NK), When the strong man dies, the party dies with it.

My optimistic prediction is that Trump keeps all of our blood pressure high for 4 years, and then we witness the actual death of the GOP, and that in average, most things will stay more or less the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m going to let myself believe this but for the same reason I might have weed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

how is it that everyone seems to have forgotten about this: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

trump owns the judicial branch and they put him above the law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Challenged in court? The bloody dude was announced above the law BY THE SUPREME COURT. As long as he OFFICIALLY kills all opposition, he’s got a full green light on everything. The only thing stopping him will be military officers refusing orders that are too fucking outlandish. Tho I doubt the police will care too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Immunizing Trump as an individual from prosecution related to acts performed as President, while deeply problematic, will not prevent legal challengs his EO’s. Striking down a president’s EO is completely different than convicting a president with a crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I don’t really see the difference, considering he can just lock anybody who opposes him up. People are already bending over for him out of fear, people that used to be critical of him. Challenging him will take some serious balls facing a suicide mission.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Oh sure the courts will sure stop him guys! He won’t totally just, do whatever the fuck he wants

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

yeah, they’ll put him in jail, you’ll see! With all the things he did that won’t be long! Very soon! Right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

They are already putting him in jail for all the other crimes he’s committed… Shouldn’t be too hard to give him more time!

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

That’s why he’s been stacking the courts for the last eight years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Considering how much time it took Obamas orders to even get to the Supreme Court, it can be as biased as he wants it: There’s no way they’ll get through all of it in a timely manner. Plus, there are still state courts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ooh I hope to retain your optimism in the next few years…

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

How about this new thing that came out today - he’s establishing the board to purge generals.

Is he readying complete takeover?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Of course. He’s already said he only needs to be a dictator on Day One. And the if you vote for him, “You’ll never have to vote again.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well that’s terrifying. He knows the military won’t back him in a coup… As is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Leaving the World Health Organization is terrifying

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I read that as “flurry of executions”, and though “sounds plausible”

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Because he already did that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Goddammit we were all warned about this MULTIPLE fucking times.

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*

“I’ll be a dictator on day one.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 520K

    Comments