-33 points
*

It’s likely that the editors and principles have been betrayed by this point and thus Encycla and ibis.wiki should be the places we can flock to.

Edit: What’s going on with the downvotes? What is despicable or freakish about discussing Wikipedia through a critical lens?

X, for example, is discussed through a critical lens ad nauseum in many mainstream publications throughout the English-speaking world. Do you find that despicable, too?

Wikipedia has very big problems that profoundly effect public discourse. Yet almost nobody knows about them.

Out of curiosity, why is criticism of Wikipedia so infuriating to you? You can just take a look at what Tracing Woodgrains had written about Wikipedia or rather, the following by Aaron Swartz who’ve seen the problems far away.

http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/wikiroads

I’ll be blunt here for die-hard defenders of Wikipedia; are you going to die on a wrong hill where the Andrew Tate fanboys are currently on just because of a website and institution which is far from perfect just like X, Meta, and United Nations?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

What are the differences in those sites’ governance which would immunize them from a similar legal attack by the BJP?

They probably don’t have half the legal staff of Wikipedia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Who actually uses those sites

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

First time I’m hearing about either of these which is going to be a problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I hadn’t either but tbf most people hadn’t heard of the fediverse until that Reddit thing. In this case the entirety of Wikipedia could along with an exodus, should one be warranted

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Most people still haven’t heard of the fediverse. We’re in a tiny bubble here, an insignificant fraction standing disconnected from the vast majority of the population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What’s going on here?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

You can click the article to find out!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I can?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

https://www.thewikipedian.net/p/wmf-bjp-court-order-sell-out-principles

Edit: Don’t downvote this person please. They just phrased their question badly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And that’s only the tip of the iceberg.

https://www.reddit.com/r/justwikipediathings/wiki/index

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’ve been blocked by network security.

To continue, log in to your Reddit account or use your developer token

If you think you’ve been blocked by mistake, file a ticket below and we’ll look into it.

Log in File a ticket

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
11 points

Doesn’t apply in this case, it’s about a decision that is still pending

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

So block the article in India but there’s no reason to block it in the rest of the world. Fuck India’s government gonna do to them?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

We were blocked in Turkey for 3 years or so, and fought all the way to the Supreme Court and won. Nothing has changed about our principles. The difference in this case is that the short term legal requirements in order to not wreck the long term chance of victory made this a necessary step.

Hopefully not block the entire website in India.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why? VPNs exist and fuck Modi

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not everyone knows of/has access to VPN’s.

I don’t disagree with your sentiment, but I also get why they’d rather try to resolve it legally. If they succeed it will allow for much easier access for the majority of visitors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

I never bought the “world biggest democracy” publicity stun. And each day it’s more and more obvious that India is not a true democracy. They have always prosecuted and try to kill anyone opposing the regime, and half the population (women) don’t have the same rights as men. They are one of the lowest countries in gender equality index. Without half the population it is imposible to be a democracy.

permalink
report
reply
-8 points

and half the population (women) don’t have the same rights as men

Backed up by something or just your feelings

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Backed on Global Gender Gap Index https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Gender_Gap_Report

Or any other gender equality index that always put India on the bottom. Very bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

most democratic countries cosplay as democracies. just like most communist countries cosplayed as communist.

ideology in its purest form. After the death of God, you need something to fill that unapproachable void. So you inject ideals- civil service, egalitarianism, tolerance, justice, etc – values that are virtuous and aspirational, but ultimately are just shiny veneers over a darker truth. it functions as scaffolding for systems that serve the interests of raw power. it is theater. performance. spectacle. underneath, the mechanisms of control, inequality, and corruption remain unchanged.

don’t make the mistake of believing that India is somehow unique here

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments