56 points

Good old “Nothing will fundamentally change” Joe.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Hey now at least he helped start a genocide.

What a legacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

slavers gonna slave

that is our legacy

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

thank you for starting one in America too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Ah yes, the people calling out the democrats for facilitating genocide are responsible for the democrats loss. If nobody called them out, genocide would have been extremely popular.

Of course, if we had the power to sway the election, I wonder why the democrats didn’t just listen to us and stop facilitating genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

But then the democrats couldn’t dangle it in front of us next election.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

Crime Bill Biden ran out the clock on purpose. He never had any intention to reschedule cannabis.

NONE.

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

The only meaningful change for this would be via legislation, otherwise trump can just as easily undo it the same day.

Edit: looks like the process is much more complicated and actually Biden already started the process at the beginning of this year (April): https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/update-deas-efforts-reschedule-cannabis-what-you-need-know-2024-09-11/ , I don’t understand this article

Edit 2: the letter is actually asking him to try to hurry the process up (the article from September that I linked says there supposed to be hearing scheduled this Monday (Dec 2nd)). It is very misleading (as you can see from the comments), because it implies Biden is just ignoring this issue completely.

https://lee.house.gov/imo/media/doc/letter_to_biden_admin_re_marijuana.pdf

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

He actually started the process to review what it was scheduled as to get it changed in 2022. It like everything else surrounding our government takes forever.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-submits-proposed-regulation-reschedule-marijuana

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It like everything else surrounding our government takes forever.

Unless of course it’s something he wants to do, like sell weapons for an ongoing genocide. Then all bureaucracy evaporates into nothingness.

His hands are untied when he wants them to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Everything with government doesn’t have to be slow, but congress wrote this bill so that two successive presidents would have to keep pursuing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

looks like the process is much more complicated and actually Biden already started the process at the beginning of this year

Right. He waited until it couldn’t be completed until after the end of his term. On purpose. He ran out the clock. On purpose.

He never wanted to reschedule cannabis and dragged his feet until he didn’t have to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The CSA requires that such actions be made through formal rulemaking on the record after opportunity for a hearing.

Y’all still haven’t learned that the US president isn’t god king, hu? He can’t just do shit by fiat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You still haven’t learned that US legal precedent is God king. New rules dropped, presidential acts are all the rage. Biden just has to say those two words and he can regulate how long your ball hair is allowed to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

All that needs to happen is for SCOTUS to agree.

Should be easy 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

He was never going to do it and never will.

permalink
report
reply
-14 points

Do what? Pardon people from state crimes, which he cannot do. Or write legislation making marijuana legal, which he can’t do?

The reason charges for drugs are different in every state is because they are state laws, tried by those states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Do what?

Reschedule cannabis.

Stop making excuses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

The CSA requires that such actions be made through formal rulemaking on the record after opportunity for a hearing.

Y’all still haven’t learned that the US president isn’t god king, hu? He can’t just do shit by fiat.

On another note, I want to call out this link where we can evidently watch the proceedings Dec 2, 0900-1700 (assuming that’s EST): www.DEA.gov/live

Edit: I just read the letter (.pdf warning) and it basically contains 2 asks:

  1. Expand clemency for those with weed convictions.
  2. Issue an updated memo which would de-prioritize seizing weed and prosecuting individuals and businesses for state-legal weed activity.

I don’t disagree. This just isn’t the silver bullet many here seem to think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Reschedule. Plain and simple

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

How?

The HHS is a deciding factor with set rules created by Congress. To change it would be invalid and blocked by any judge before going into effect. Destroying the credibility of what was occuring and killing it in its tracks when it could otherwise finish. Trump doesn’t want to stop that, neither does Kennedy (Pretty sure he’s for it)

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Guessing weed business would boom, and government gain a tonne of tax, which Trump would take credit for.

So no. Can’t see him doing it.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Big tax cash cow here in Canada, that’s for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 468K

    Comments