Summary

President-elect Donald Trump and his incoming administration are debating the extent of potential U.S. military action against Mexican drug cartels.

Options discussed include targeted airstrikes, cyberattacks, covert operations, and “soft invasions” using special forces. Trump has warned Mexico to curb fentanyl trafficking or face military intervention.

His key appointees, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, support some form of military action, framing cartels as terrorist threats.

Critics fear this could escalate tensions with Mexico and spark significant international controversy.

-3 points

Brings me back to Reddit in the early days of the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Pessimism about war wasn’t very welcome among the lulz at Russia’s bluster about their prowess and impending parade in Kyiv. “Ukraine will win any day lol look Russia’s shit is crap”.

The USA is acting just like Russia. Leaders and people.

If it walks like a cuck, talks like a cuck, and cucks like a cuck, well…

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

Invade Mexico for what? Is this one of those “if we make them part of the country, there won’t be a border to cross” type of things?

Edit: Haha I didn’t read they wanted to go after the cartels.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

What’s USA’s record against insurgents? I know Trump went to the Taliban to make a deal after more than 2 decades fighting them.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Not remotely comparable. Different fighters with different experiences and motivations. Fighting next door vs. halfway around the planet changes logistics, uh, a teeny bit. Different US government and soldier motivations.

We’ve never done anything like this, no way to tell what will happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Well, except for all the other times we invaded countries in Latin America.

And except for that time we invaded Mexico all the way down to Mexico City.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“Invaded” with both hands tied behind our back.

And my reply was to a post about failing in Afghanistan. So, uh, everything I said still stands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well there was that one time, about 212 years ago, and ya’ll had a terrible time about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bro…

We didn’t win at the Alamo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The good guys (the ones opposing slavery) won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We won at a hell of lot more times and places though. In fact the Alamo stands out partially because we were generally winning on the border region all the way through Mexico’s 1920 conflict.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And the United States wasn’t the world’s sole superpower. That’s like saying Republicans defeated slavery. True, but things have changed just a bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If he tries to cut a deal with them it’ll probably include Texas annexation 😬

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d be down, love their president and all she’s for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I wholly support Texas going elsewhere and shutting the fuck up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Mexico can have Texas back. We should send them a Thank You card for doing so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

We just elected an attempted insurgent!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Idk, seems to me like a successful insurgent. Maybe not an immediate result but, with no real punishment, and getting in anyway, he def got away with it, and rewarded for doing it to boot. If there are future (non sham) elections, the message is loud and clear, this I’d acceptable behavior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He’ll hand over the Mexican government to the Zetas in exchange for some empty promises.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You joke but this proposal would effectively be a declaration of war on heavily armed criminals who already run parts of the country. There’s every possibility he destabilizes the place enough that surrendering Mexico City to the Zetas is how it ends.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s a bit more complicated than most people realize. They know about Vietnam (loss), Iraq (win), and Afghanistan (loss). But there’s also;

More recently -

  • The Philippines (win),
  • Lebanon (draw, objective achieved, but no decisive victory)
  • Somalia (draw, transition government was not deposed, no decisive victory),

And through the years -

  • The Indian Wars 1776-1923 (win, massive war crimes),
  • US-Algiers (loss, impetus for creating the Navy),
  • The Barbary Wars (win),
  • Taiping Rebellion (Win),
  • Kansas mini Civil War (1854, goes into actual Civil War, Abolitionist win)
  • Second Opium war (win)
  • Utah Secession (win),
  • Mexican Civil War (win),
  • Cortina War (win),
  • Formosa Expedition (loss),
  • Garza War (win),
  • Las Cuevas War (win),
  • Boxer Rebellion (win),
  • Mexican Border War (win),
  • Banana Wars 1912-1934 (win)
  • Philippines Rebellion (win, but they do resurface for a modern conflict)

You can see why we were a tad over confident going into Vietnam and even afterwards we thought we just needed to make some adjustments to our tactics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Or they could save billions, AND make billions after, just by legalize, tax and regulate it. Once that happens, the cartels will die off on their own. But hey, the defense lobby is really strong… So.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Been screaming that for years, now it’s too late. The cartels got wise and diversified their portfolio. We can no longer pull their teeth by legalizing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Indeed, FFS, just legalize all of it. The WOSD has been far more harmful than the drugs themselves. But moneyed interests definitely want them illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Sorry to break it to you, but cartels are never gonna die off. They’re not something that’s currently happening in Mexico, they’re the backbone of the Mexican economy and have been since the revolution war a hundred years ago.

More context: Cartels, although they weren’t called that back then, are how the revolution war was financed. They basically rolled up into small towns and took everything that wasn’t nailed down —including women— under the pretext that they needed it to “fight for freedom”. When the revolution ended and they had no excuse to ransack villages anymore, they pivoted onto drugs. If drugs are legalized, they’re just gonna pivot to something else. Right now, there’s cartels who barely sell drugs and make most of their money through kidnappings and extortion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There’s cartels controlling the growth and distribution of Avocados. All the criminal behavior, none of the drugs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t know if Trump knows this but a lot of things here are made in Mexico.

permalink
report
reply

Nah he’s got that covered, hes going to charge us 25% more for all of them, destabilize the region further and wonder why the border issues increase instead of decrease, causing our international dealings to degrade further and respect to keep plummeting

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 469K

    Comments