Yes, I know that the ranking is not a good metric of real world use.

Just posting this because MX Linux has been in the number one spot for a long time (2 years perhaps?) and it’s surprising to see some other distro on the top of their site.

https://distrowatch.com/

34 points

Funny never heard of mx linux

permalink
report
reply
23 points

No one has until they look at distro watch /j

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You say that as a joke, but that is exactly how I figured out it exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I really don’t think the /j is necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

It’s funny and awesome that the two top distro are Ubuntu remixes that remove snap.

Edit: I’m wrong. MX uses Debian as upstream, not Ubuntu, which removes any snap related tech from the picture entirely.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

IMO Ubuntu without Snap, but with a default Gnome or KDE (and a visual DE selector screen during installation) would be absolutely perfect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What? MX Linux is a Debian remix in the style of antiX I thought?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Shoot, you’re right. I thought MX used Ubuntu as upstream but it uses Debian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
117 points

MX Linux, the king of asking ‘what’s Mx linux’ and inadvertently fueling its growth in distrowatch

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Save me the trouble, what is it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

It’s Debian with customizations, as well as some custom GUI programs for managing the system.

https://mxlinux.org/

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Just think of it as Ubuntu with wm and no bloat

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Motocross Linux

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Look it up on distrowatch

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I wonder how long it will take before it will drop off the top 10.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Somewhere in between 10000 years and 5 minutes

permalink
report
parent
reply

I really like mint although i never used it again.
Pros using mint :

  • It’s easy to learn
  • It’s stable
  • It’s Windows XP like
  • Not recourse hogging like KDE
  • Easy to customize

Cons using mint :

  • It’s debian based
permalink
report
reply
18 points

Not recourse hogging like KDE

KDE has been hogging no resources for ages now, it’s really snappy even on not so powerful machines!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

How many fucking years will we be out of KDE 4 before these yahoos figure that out?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, unless you install some buggy stuff on top it’s as snappy as xfce - tested on literally j4125 (it’s GPU helps), with wobbly burning windows and everything no holdups, smol RAM usage too (especially stock).

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Cons: It’s not Debian

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s what LMDE is for :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s still not Debian ;)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Debian based is alright, I’m more against it for being based on Ubuntu. Also con: apt

Not recourse hogging like KDE

Really not that bad nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There is an official Debian-based edition of Mint: LMDE. It’s what I use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

yeah I run kde on my 12yo laptop and it’s smooth

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why is Debian based a problem? I ask this as my first IRL Linux user that taught me about Linux still uses Debian Unstable as his daily driver workhorse, and he is a CS Theory Doctor, and has to reboot his system once a year or so to keep it functioning properly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

New to Linux, why is Debian based considerd a con?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Very old packages.

They have security updates, but are usually held back years to ensure stability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Cinnamon is way more resource hogging than KDE.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I really don’t like Mint. It feels like a discount version of Debian/Ubuntu to me. It makes it even worse that the person who introduced it to me has all the worst toxic traits. Now I can’t see it as a good alternative.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

It’s Ubuntu without Snaps and a nice DE.

Ignore people when it comes to software. Many advocate Mint. Some are lovely, some are dicks. That goes for every distro.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

It might just be a matter of perspective. I’m not very knowledgeable on distros, so my opinion may come from ignorance:

To me, Ubuntu is too resource intensive with too much going on. Mint seems relatively lean yet modern, with all the basics covered. Debian is a little sparse (no sudo, no fdisk, what’s going on here?).

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Who told you you can’t sudo on Debian? ^^ I feel like Debian is flexible enough to give you the system you might want without the bullshit. Ubuntu has lost its way last decade, but you can still debloat it mostly and use one of its alternatives. The Cinnamon DE has improved a lot, but it still feels like Windows Vista to me.

I ended up using NixOS lately so I can have the flexibility, newer packages and very clean repeatable configuration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I haven’t seen sudo installed by default on debian. Probably the comment is about that. When you start you tend to use only what is already there to not mess things too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Kubuntu is where it’s at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Everyone forgets Xubuntu 🫠

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ve never understood the Mint hype. Like you say it seems like Ubuntu with extra steps.

I do have beefs with some of the decisions Canonical makes but if anyone asks me what distri they should start with I will always recommend Ubuntu simply because it’s “the distro” if you search for “Linux” tutorials online 9 times out of 10 you will get a tutorial aimed at Ubuntu. Packages for software that isn’t in repos are usually available as .deb …

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not really a hype. It just vibes with a lot of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Someone doesn’t like windows because they put ads in their start menu: aww you’re sweet

Someone doesn’t like Ubuntu because they put ads in their start menu: hello, human resources?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you’re a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we’re excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let’s dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 667

    Posts

  • 5K

    Comments

Community moderators