102 points

Friendly reminder that Thunderbird is a great way to handle multiple email accounts on the desktop.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

There are no perfect desktop email clients, but Thunderbird is pretty great.

It’s a little too powerful for my needs, so I stick to Claws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I moved away from a desktop client for several years because of Thunderbird staying stuck in the 2010s, but the redesign brought me back into the fold. It’s certainly overkill for scanning through subject lines, but compared to having five tabs open …

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Bluemail is decent. But im still always looking for better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Mailspring is pretty cool :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Correct me if I’m wrong, I very well might be, but doesn’t Bluemail do the same thing as the new Outlook for their “instant push” feature? I don’t see how else they’d accomplish that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ain’t that the truth.

Geary is so close to perfect but they depend on Gnome Online accounts which doesn’t support O365 so I can use it for everything but my university email.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But Thunderbird still doesn’t support outlook calendar etc right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It does support any good calendar using CalDav standard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I must say I’m quite pleased with it too. The previous time I tried it was in 2005 and it was just ok. I also recently found out about the Owl add-on. Really makes it a good alternative

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I hate how they use quotes around the name Thunderbird…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It can even look great with the Monterail Dark 2 Add-On.

(For some reason I had to download it and then install it from the downloaded file, but it DOES work!)

Also available in a Full Dark mode version

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

What a clickbaity article. I’m all for exposing bad stuff but this article presents zero proof of it transferring passwords. It also fails to highlight the manner of how data voluntarily synced to MS is handled. All in all it doesn’t do anything but trying to steer users to it’s own services.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

So reading another article (https://www.heise.de/news/Microsoft-lays-hands-on-login-data-Beware-of-the-new-Outlook-9358925.html )makes it more clear. If you consent to syncing IMAP account to outlook then it will transfer IMAP username password and mailserver config to Outlook.

I mean, they could have specified that your IMAP credentials would be synced, but it’s redundant considering you’re telling it to sync.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I know, right? Jesus I hate bullshit tech “reporting” like this. This particular comment just smacks of outrage “journalism”:

Microsoft gets full access to mails, calendars and contacts!

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

To be fair, they aren’t journalists. They’re a privacy-centric mail provider that is warning their customers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It is very easy to find other sources making the same claim, such as this one which includes an image of allegedly posted json including passwords.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Which I already posted before your reply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Nice timing. I don’t see how warning you that your email passwords will be kept remotely by Microsoft would be “redundant.” Many people will assume from that message that it would only send them all your mail, and the even more carelessly optimistic among us might guess that it would be end-to-end encrypted as it obviously should be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

As for third party accounts you can only select IMAP, no pop3, sand it warns you’d be logged in thorough Microsoft servers, they don’t even try to hide it

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I am so grateful I left Windows and move to Linux.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Best decision of my life… After initial set up, it works better than microshit whore OS. You pay but it does not love you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What an analogy! Summarises my experience with Win vs linux. Still on “early dates” with linux, but it does get better and better, while MS seemingly deliberately tries to alienate me with every new update. Won’t be a returning customer!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Here here, best 6 years ever. Never looked back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Outlook has nothing to do with the OS though? You can get the same Outlook app on MacOS too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What its your point buddy ? I didn’t get it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

It’s ok Microsoft are very sorry you found out

permalink
report
reply
21 points

PSA: mailbox.org has a great, privacy focused email service.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I went on a trawl on email security and privacy.

It doesn’t fucking exist.

Regular mails w/e sure

But I’m never talking to someone via email again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Agreed, but unfortunately, unless they implement VJOURNAL in their caldav implementation, I’ll probably switch to Fastmail when my prepay is up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Fastmail is a great provider, very happy customers, but with them being in a five eyes country, I don’t trust them. But it’s only email which is a nightmare protocol regarding privacy anyways so I don’t really care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Encryption + POP should be part of every privacy conscious person’s repertoire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Privacy-focused email doesn’t truly exist, since it’s likely 90%+ of people you email are probably using Gmail, Hotmail/Outlook, or Yahoo. Companies like Gmail/Google could still build a profile of you if they wanted to, by collecting all the threads you’re a participant in.

The best you can do is self-host your mailbox (e.g. Using Mailcow) with an encrypted file system (e.g. using LUKS), but you’d still need to use an SMTP gateway to ensure deliverability, so it’s going to be relayed through, and ultimately end up at, some third-party you have no control over. Some third-parties don’t even have TLS enabled for their email servers.

You shouldn’t think of email as a private or secure communication mechanism unless you’re encrypting your emails.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3K

    Posts

  • 54K

    Comments