51 points

I love how every single source emphasizes it’s “single-planet”, just because it’s by Hello Games.

Cause fantasy games with dragons are famously known to all contain interstellar travel.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

I think the emphasis on the “planet” is that in their usual over-ambition, Hello Games announced that they’ll be simulating a full-scale planet. It then got through the media’s broken telephone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Cause fantasy games with dragons are famously known to all contain interstellar travel.

Well, Ultima did, so it is technically an early feature of the genre.

As an aside, I would love to see the concept of “high fantasy space opera” get more love.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

I mean, we have Pathfinder which spans over an entire Star system and even beyond but still is a fantasy roleplaying game. (Same with Dungeons and Dragons)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They probably specified to emphasize that despite NMS being interstellar, this one isn’t. Since they’re known for the former, that reputation comes with the baggage of expecting a similar experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply

This really felt like the NMS engine rethemed. As much as I love NMS I hope this game has more story/direction.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I really hope the flying mechanics are more fluid than NMS but they look similarly hokey.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

100%. More Subnautica-style linear progression, much much less live-service-style chaos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I will be surprised if the DLC isn’t paid this time around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Lots of similarities. I also think it’s the same engine. I wonder how the combat will be as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think it will. It looks like a mix of Rust and RuneScape

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was thinking someone is finally making T’rain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The little news I’ve seen seems to tag this as a sandbox game, and considering the scale I wouldn’t hold my breath…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Unless they’ve fired the absolute moron(s) who designed the crafting and alien language system in NMS, I say stay far away.

I mean, combining dihydrogen and oxygen yields… NaCl? And you learn alien words literally one at a time? Oh but they have procedural generation! Except every single space station looks identical.

IMO This is a developer who does not respect their players. And somehow they’ve convinced a lot of people that periodically adding more shallow grindy fetch quests means the core gameplay isn’t garbage.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

It doesn’t mean it’s bad just because it doesn’t cater to your tastes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I really wanted to like NMS. The core concept is 100% up my alley, it looks pretty good, and it’s a neat sandbox. I suppose it’s not bad if you’re the kind of player who is happy mindlessly gathering resources so you can craft an ornate base. Hell, I played quite a bit because I was determined to collect one of every type of spaceship.

But I really do think the gameplay is objectively bad by almost any possible measure. The on-foot traversal is terrible, waiting around for refiners sucks (though at least they had the sense to give a backpack refiner), trying to get the actual spaceship you want is awful, flying towards the galactic center is a chore, and I could go on. I guess the gunplay is serviceable, but the enemies aren’t the least bit interesting aside from maybe the largest walker bots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I mean I don’t totally disagree with your statements, but how much playtime do you have in NMS? I have 85 hours and I am totally satisfied aka not thinking of returning regarding new patches with new “content”. Does that make it a bad game? I don’t think so. Is it the best spacesim ever, I don’t think so either. But it gets some features really nicely done:

  • like the feeling of and endless universe where you can travel wherever you want,
  • the exploration part where you are looking for your favourite planet ecosystem (it NEEDS dinosaurs!)
  • the crafting part, although I no clue how it changed to some years ago
  • starting and landing on planets (hi Shitfield)

But I agree the core gameplay loop is quite shallow, I see it more as a “light” sandbox game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

This is the worst take I’ve seen in a LOOONG time. The language learning is one of the best systems in NMS. The developers literally spent YEARS adding to the game, completely for free, but they don’t “respect their players”?

Not every game has to be for you, bud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The developers literally spent YEARS adding to the game, completely for free, but they don’t “respect their players”?

They ever apologized for lying for years to the players, who they respect so much?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Which lies were those, exactly? Please be precise so you can’t move your goalposts later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

What are you talking about? The player literally learns nothing about the alien languages. All you do is walk up to a NPC, button mash through absolutely inconsequential filler text, and pick the option that says “teach me a word”. Then a popup says “You now know the Korvax word for ‘THE’”, except it doesn’t even tell you which alien word was translated or explain any grammar or context or conjugation or anything. Your character just does a magical substitution from that point forward.

Or you can do the same thing by walking up to the black pillars if you’d rather trudge around a planet surface for macguffins.

How in any way is that a good system? There’s zero skill or challenge or reward or even real gameplay here. A word search puzzle would have 100x more depth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Wow…. I hope you’re not serious with this nonsense. I mean, it’s your opinion and all, but it reads like satire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Playing the game felt like satire. Basic questions I would expect other devs of sci-fi games to ask themselves seemingly either went unanswered or got super lazy answers.

e.g. “Should we let players customize their spaceships?” to which HG apparently thinks their system of solely generating ships from a random permutation of parts is plenty. Or “Do you think different planets and galaxies would have different hostile flora?”, to which they decided “nah, the same 3 are fine everywhere”. “Should planets have biomes of any kind, at least ice caps maybe?”… “nah, players don’t care if planets are basically uniform.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

lol… okay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They would have just abandoned the game if they didn’t respect the player base. I’m really interested why you have such a hate boner for hello games, I say this as someone who does not enjoy nms but respect that they kept trying to improve it over rhe years.

So many big game studios in the last 10 years (i.e. Activision, ea) have just shit all over the fans then wait a year and do it all over again. It’s really hard to hate a small dev team that at least is trying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

EA, Activision, Ubisoft… their BS is on another level entirely and I generally don’t play their games because if it.

For NMS / Hello Games it’s more that I really want to like the game but find it immensely frustrating that after years and years of updates, they still haven’t fixed some of the most basic elements.

Like when your character sprints, the tiniest bump in terrain cancels the sprinting. This even happens in the Nexus where it looks like flat ground. Why?

Again for the alien languages… there’s no dictionary in this universe? I’m supposed to believe interstellar travel is commonplace, but they don’t have an app to translate the 3 ubiquitous languages? I have a device in my hand right now that can do that.

Space combat still isn’t balanced. If you alternate between the phase beam with the shield absorb upgrade and any other weapon, you can basically wear down any threat and win.

What has actually been improved about the core game of NMS? People keep telling me that in vague terms without saying what specifically was improved. I know the inventory system is better (but still kind of a mess IMO), but what else? Don’t say multiplayer because they promised that at the beginning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fair enough on all of your points, it sounds like you’ve played more nms than I have. I do agree with you about the core game being somewhat flawed, I get bored very quickly trying to play it. I get the feeling this game just isn’t for people like us, but without a doubt they’re doing something right for their player base

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

One of the most interesting games shown, besides Wilds.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

So what’s the core gameplay loop?

We are shown exploration but little to find besides landscape. We are shown building simple houses with prefabs. We see very basic npc interaction to your presence. But that’s it. NMS biggest issue is that there isn’t that much to do and it’s depth is shallow. I’m seeing nothing here to dissuade that.

permalink
report
reply

Gaming

!gaming@beehaw.org

Create post

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it’s gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming’s sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.5K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments