1 point

Not all of the buttons. Please be reasonable. Just some of the buttons.

I don’t need memory buttons.

I don’t want to push the button half a dozen times, just to miss the menu I wanted by 1 click, and have to go around again.

I don’t need separate am fm and cd buttons.

I really don’t mind a touch screen for climate control, or audio interface. Just keep the business from moving around the screen at all and I’m pretty happy.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

I was with you up until the climate controls.

Any control you can find in a 1997 Hyundai Accent should be physical.

Anything else can be hidden behind a touchscreen because I’m not going to use it while driving anyway.

My big request would be to drop the USB cable. I don’t know why I need to connect both USB and Bluetooth. I’d love to just leave my cell in my bag where it belongs instead of advertising yet another reason why someone should smash my windows in!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Really the only thing on my Tesla I ever need to access on the touchscreen while driving is the climate controls (assuming I don’t want to use voice, which is a pain as it hears you wrong)

The other used to be fog lights, but I just keep those on now for extra visibility, like another day time running light.

Everything else including wipers I can do from the wheel now without having to touch the screen.

I only use voice to choose a new song/artist, I’m not trying to navigate spotify by hand while driving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah climate control is where he lost me. My wife’s Honda odyssey has that.

I’m okay with the soft-buttons for memory, or to toggle input, since they are always in fixed locations. In fact soft-buttons are slightly better because they are labeled with the station….though my 2013 Passat has the better compromise of a physical button with the station printed above it.

But HVAC is where I draw the line. I guess the trade off would be that a thermostatically controlled digital systems are probably more simplistic, in their operation and maintenance, than the vacuum-and-linkage systems of yore, and this gives way to multi-zone climate systems in mass market cars. But I still hate that I have to utilize the touchscreen to change which blowers are on or to change the temperature in the rear zone, which blocks GPS if you’re using CarPlay/Android Auto/Nav (I’d assume, I don’t have nav).

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What in hearing is … Dials are good too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just wait 'til you try this knob!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Love a good knob…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Unpopular opinion: Unresponsive buttons are just as bad as unresponsive touchscreens. And touchscreens are not bad if you don’t have 5 keys presses to get what you want, if you can customise your layout and if the system is not underpowered as they always seem to be.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

haptics of a button means that you can keep your focus on the street while pressing a button.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Don’t know what buttons or touch screens you have in your care but in my car it’s way easier to hit the button than the exact location on the touch screen. You can ‘feel’ your way to a button on a dashboard, you can’t do it on a touch screen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

there should never be a fucking touch screen menu in a car for any reason

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Maps? Android Auto / CarPlay? Gotta have the screen anyway for the mandatory backup camera.

We can have both! Physical buttons for everything that doesn’t actually benefit from having a display, (like music or heat/ac), touch screen for the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Just like my 2019 Hyundai Ioniq. Buttons for the car stuff and a touchscreen for media, calls, navigation, backup camera, etc. If the touchscreen were to shit the bed I’d still have a fully functional car minus the backup camera.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

You want buttons back because they’re easier to use

I want them back because I think car interiors look bland without them

We are not the same…alright I also want them back for the first reason aswell.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Safer to use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I wonder if they can also make a vehicle not near the bottom of the reliability rankings next?

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Lol, careful, you’ll waken the VW mob. They don’t like to hear what garbage VWs are.

Can’t give me one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It appears there has been a few that caught this. I was surprised they were so far down the Consumer’s Report list for reliability as it was but honestly I don’t really think of the brand that much as it’s something my parents owned when I was a little kid then they moved onto Toyota and domestics.

It’s not to say others are better. I’ve was surprised by Ford’s decent down the list but not by Jeep’s continued place down there and I’ve owned many Jeeps.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 551K

    Comments