Ukraine will be able to use Danish and Dutch F-16s to strike into Russia, while Belgium is saying only for use in 1991-border Ukraine.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/Iv4Fu

26 points

Ukraine: “I consent.”

Denmark: “I consent.”

Russia: “Was there somebody you forgot to ask?”

The myth of consentual flights of F-16s into Russian territory.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Same way Russia forgot to ask Ukraine, Ukraine forgot to ask Russia. Seems fair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

forgot to ask Ukraine

After how many Minsk Agreements mediated by the OSCE would you consider Ukraine properly “asked”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The same ones that Russia and Ukraine hates? They can’t even agree on the meaning of them, since they are such an ambiguous mess that doesn’t specify anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well since neither of them included any sort of language to the effect of “Russia gets to invade if the terms of this agreement aren’t upheld”, I’m gonna go with more than two. Especially considering DPR forces kept pushing for Debaltseve after both agreements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The same way Ukraine forgot to ask the families of Jewish people killed in the Holocaust if they could put up statues and monuments commemorating Nazi collaborators including OUN members who participated in carrying out the Holocaust?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

On the other hand, who gives a shit if Russia burns for their ongoing aggression.

Not many people complain when an entire country reaches the “find out” part of “fuck around and find out” when they’ve had many years to course correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think what they meant is that those planes are not getting to Russia before being destroyed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The problem with the Danes is that they have been so sheltered for so long that the concept of their actions having consequences simply don’t register any more. Everything is going to be welfare, roast pork and padding ourselves on the back for all eternity, war and disaster and calamity is something they have in “the warm countries”, it will never affect us.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

So what happens if some Danish military bases get bombed or a frigate gets sunk with dozens of dead? Does Denmark pull back or call for WWIII?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Lots of commotion internally in Denmark while the reaction would be decided upon in Washington.

I don’t think Russia wants to retaliate so directly though. As I see it they have very little to gain from taking that bait. More likely acts of retaliation would be plausibly deniable cyber attacks or supporting some proxy in attacking Danish interests abroad. If I was a Danish troop in Iraq, I would be watching my back after this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I doubt Russia would escalate in that way. If it happens, I’d imagine a “tit for tat” thing happening, where the Nordic countries sink the Russian Baltic Fleet and say that they consider the matter resolved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

When you say nordic countries, you mean sweden, norway, and finland would do a massive escalation, and open themselves up to retaliation? Surely they’d do the calculus and see there’s nothing to gain and a lot to lose? I’ve heard the political situation in the EU was not great, but I expect that kind of hawkishness here on the other side of the planet, not from the countries that actually stand to lose anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

patting*

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The Kremlin’s jets are flying over Ukraine and part of their barbaric land grab, why shouldn’t Ukrainians fly over Russia to stop attacks on their home?

Go bomb the shit out of them. Shoot down the terrorist bombers launching missiles at markets and playgrounds.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Nice gesture but why would Ukraine risk losing their new toys on adventurism where is work closer to to home to be done.

Now if they were supplying rockets with ranges over 200km and then they gave consent to such use… That would be a more meaningful move and would let Russia know that using NK rockets has consequences.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Nice gesture but why would Ukraine risk losing their new toys on adventurism where is work closer to to home to be done.

Where the frontline is close to the official border, Russia is able to keep its artillery and logistics on the Russian side of the border where Ukraine is not allowed to use half of its equipment. Russia’s ongoing Kharkiv offensive is an example of this

Now if they were supplying rockets with ranges over 200km

France and Britain have been supplying the storm shadow missile, which has almost three times that range. Ukraine has been launching it from its own Su-24 aircraft, but those are very old and there aren’t a lot of them left. The F-16 could be a good new platform to launch them from. As I understand it, storm shadow and F-16 are not compatible out of the box and would need some modification, but the same was true for the Su-24 and that appears to have worked out

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Would Ukraine be able to fly planes close enough to strike within Russia given Russian strong anti air set up?

Can Ukraine use stormshadows within Russia?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well they’ve been flying Su-24s, and the F-16s certainly shouldn’t be any less capable than those for this sort of thing

Can Ukraine use stormshadows within Russia?

The UK okayed it a couple of weeks ago, France this week

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

This means it is the US who has authorized them flying over Russian territory, Usually it is the country of origin that holds the right to specify how those arms should not be used.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Good thing Russia allowed Ukraine to use all those Migs and SUs against them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The country of origin of those jets no longer exists. The USSR fell a while ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Interesting Global News

!globalnews@lemmy.zip

Create post

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn’t have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 2.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments

Community moderators