Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
then abolish roosters as well
I was playing around with stable diffusion for like a day and tried to generate a surveillance cam overgrown with moss. It just wouldn’t do it, and I ended up with a bunch of pictures of trees overgrown with moss that have cams on them. The surveillance-machine-fed machine can’t imagine the surveillance machine being overgrown but it can readily imagine the surveillance machine growing on the overgrowth. I found it poetic how radically limited the creativity of the new, supposedly radical creativity machine turned out to be. Still looked kinda cool, so I rolled with it and now I’m used to it.
You could try a medium-sized fish, like herring. It’s often canned in some kind of tomato-sauce and it generally breaks up more due to the size of it. No skin or bones. If you like tuna, this could be right up your alley.
Generally, I’d also advise to have some good bread with it or some crackers or something like that. You could also try it with rice, I think.
high in sodium
you’re thinking of anchovies, I think. There’s less than a gram of salt in the 100g sardines sitting in front of me rn
high in saturated fats
again, from the sardines on my desk: 17,3g of fat per 100g; only 3,5g of those are saturated. Idk if that’s high to you, but it doesn’t seem to be to me
bpa, pcbs
like all canned foods, yea. High, also is relative here, though I can’t really find reliable numbers rn. If you know more, please share
mercury
not really, I think you’re thinking of tuna? Sardines are a very small fish near the bottom of the food network, feeding on krill - there isn’t really much bio-accumulation going on here, compared to bigger fish. There’s some mercury in them for sure, but you’d have to eat a lot of sardines to get to dangerous levels
This post has been paid for by the North Atlantic Fishery Council, I hope you have enjoyed this social media content and will consider consuming 100 - 400g of canned sardines per day.
Also just wanna say, it’s not very nice of you to be calling me an idiot when I even went out of my way to provide a CW for vegan sensibilities. I did find your post in response pretty funny though. Also also, I am eating those beans as well, don’t you worry.
pretty sure this is a direct response to my positive comment about sardines a few days ago. Even got a reply from OP there, calling me an idiot
CW for the vegans, I’ll be talking about canned fish in this comment
Check out those deenz, folks. Try and descend your snouts into a funky can of sardines this season. They’re real good; rich in bio-available Vitamin D, rich in healthy fats and they got a lot of calcium too. Get some tasty sardines (ideally, with skin on and bones in), laid to rest in a fresh drizzle of olive oil and enjoy that little bite of the seas. I’ve started eating a bunch of canned fish (mostly herring and sardines, tuna isn’t ideal) this winter and my skin is a lot better, as is the seasonal depression. Can recommend
it’s nature’s multivitamin, really
I will never eat the tinsel
sounds good and healthy tbh - and yet you still know the word shame. What I felt was so funny about the part I quoted is, that it seemed like the guy struggled to verbalize the very concept of shaming and as such defaulted to construct something with a virtue-component (that’s what the libs have right) and ended up with this hilariously over-complex-yet-primitive turn of phrase. Virtue-blackmailing alone just kinda sent me
Not saying shame is a good thing to cultivate or w/e