Every single time anyone mentions crypto always some idiot comes out of the woodwork and starts to have an argument about the definition of fiat.

So let’s just say this right now and then move on shall we, If it’s currency it’s fiat, therefore crypto is also fiat

You are correct that people commonly reuse passwords. People are stupid after all. But in this case passwords weren’t taken because they were encrypted, so all they’ve got is user names and email addresses.

From the sounds of it, the database was actually pretty secure the problem was the interface between the database and the website wasn’t. Good news is because the database was secure not a lot of sensitive information has been leaked.

How is that a counter argument?

“Sure you have a point, but I’m not going to listen to it because I don’t want to”

It’s alright, it’s been prefaced.

They want to do violent stupid things legally. But because Trump is in charge, I guess all violent stupid things are legal now.

So anyone want to take a stab at translating that?

Only usernames and email addresses were taken so nothing particularly valuable although if you’re subscribed to Earth 2 you’re probably a bit gullible, so maybe it is worth having a list of known idiots email addresses.

This is like normal Earth except more crypto. So it’s more like Earth Z

What I find weird is the number of people in Lemmy who are trying to define a grey line when it’s CP and when it’s not.

Don’t you instantly lose any kind of validity with that comment?

You are laying down the law, you are saying what is, and is not true,with no basis to reality or logic or reason. You are just saying what you say is true, and you cannot be argued with. You don’t see how fundamentally messed up that is how completely insane you sound?

You’re upset about a drawing. A drawing that isn’t even of a real thing.

You are upset about someone’s imagination and then further upset by your interpretation of the drawing of their imagination.

But they fucking didn’t, it’s an anime character you weirdo, stop trying to insinuate something that isn’t there.

Every time you try and insinuate that a series of lines are the same thing as an actual photograph you diminish the crime that you are railing against. How can you not see that?

I think you’ve just demonstrated that you’re not at all interested in rigorous intellectual discourse and instead merely interested in trying to engage in some kind of one-upmanship.