progandy

At least on xorg the gifs I had worked.

Exactly what I expected from them. The same interests that want chat control are here as well.

Exactly what I expected from them. The same interests that want chat control are here as well.

This sort of thing is the reason that the kernel has its own cve authority / cna now.

It’s interesting, that it would be hard to make a case that there was a “vulnerability” in the ip package. But it seems like this package’s entire purpose is input validation so it’s kind of weird the dev thinks otherwise.

Yes, input validation, probably for forms. What the Dev disputes is that he cannot see a case where it is used in a security critical way where

1. the input format is unknown and
2. it is essential to know if the IP is public or private.

I don’t know how it compares to nsxiv, but imv supports Wayland.

I am shocked that Facebook employees even see this as a vulnerability. I always considered metadata the valuable part of WhatsApp.

In that case you still have the third party bridge https://github.com/emersion/hydroxide

A separate routing table that takes precedence over the one modified by DHCP should works as well I think. Oh, and of course you have to use a vpn that forces its own nameserver or set one manually to prevent redirections.