I’ve noticed when threads do start they are usually engaging conversations instead of the typical one-liner meme bullshit.

Flavor the failure to a success then: in an impossible feat of strength, you managed to lift the iron gate high enough for a small creature to crawl through.

Then, depending on how important this situation is for progressing the narrative (whether you as the DM want them to get through or not), you have options to build on their success. Do they have a small creature in their party? Will they be willing to split the party? Do they have the strength to continue holding it up or is there a risk someone would be crushed crawling under? Or maybe their crit success was enough to move it but not enough to hold it at all for a chance for any one to get through.

Semantics I guess. I see your point and don’t see a problem with a DM running things that way, but I don’t think there’s a problem with letting the players enjoy the idea of a critical success on their roll while keeping things functionally the same so as not to break the game.

Same energy as CEOs demanding workers return to the office

“Where did you get that, you’re not wearing any clothes!”

The exact same thought crossed my mind when I read the title. I’m pretty sure this has been known for a while.

Edit: just read the article. The Guiana dolphin was found to have this ability several years ago, now they’ve found evidence of it in bottlenose dolphins.

Bill was submitted by a Republican, in a Republican controlled state Congress, and signed by a Republican governor. How is this a progressive issue?

Proper cat-aloging is extremely im-purr-tant for future research

Any time someone bitches about government oversight and regulations, I think about cases just like this. In many cases we should WANT a large bureaucracy with plenty of checks and approvals overseeing things like this.

I’m right there with you. It’s always those who scream the loudest