rob200
I am against, fascism, homophobia, transphobia, and others. (not exclusive to the list provided)
I believe in creating a and operating in a safe space and would never go after a person for what they believe in.
If I sense hate or annoyance from users, I either just don’t engage, and may report.
There was a u.s law passed just a few months ago that makes it illegal in the u.s to talk against Israel.
There are allot of sentences stating what could be antisemitic but it’s not limited to those, and theirs a specific definition it tells people to look at.
However, there are many reasons that add up to why the video may had been removed. I personally don’t think there was exclusively just one specific one reason for the videos removal but a atleast a couple of leading factors.
Some examples of what might add up to why it was removed could be,
- various countries just this past year introduced various hate speech laws,
2)many countries concluded together and have a more united focus on tackling hateful speech. Trying to keep the world at a peaceful state, especially for minority groups that need these protections.
There are a few others I can’t think of right this second. but all these reasons add up to the final decision for the moderation action of the video takedown.
If only fans is not encrypted, wouldn’t these cops have other ways to detect and tackle csam material?
Assuming it is not encrypted, what’s stopping them from doing their job? Only thing I can think of they could use as an excuse would be, accessing copyrighted materials, especially since it’s under a pay wall.
There was a post about this on lemmy awhile ago, I’m not sure which specific community it was i’m subscribed to a few tech related ones, but it was atleast a week or 2 or more ago about this same story.
I do agree that there should be more workers than 30 on one of the most known encrypted messaging apps.
Rayman 2 PS1, Rayman 1 PS1, Rayman Rush PS1, Rayman Arena PS2, Rayman 3 PS2, Rayman Origins Wii, Rayman Legends PS3 and Switch.
They want to squeeze out that extra bit of profit and get the users that never subscribed on there so they can boast about improved numbers.
if your internet can handle the bandwith for cloud gaming app Luna can do wonders.
Why does Mozilla need ad dollars? Firefox is open source? If they don’t have a search engine what buisness do they feel thatvthey need this? Ads in Firefox potententially incoming??
If they would just stick with Firefox and nothing else they would be alright but they just keep doing things their userbase won’t like. They keep rissing their own expenses, for what? And wonder why no one uses Firefox. I wonder why.
The android app is about as clunky like Chrome even though it doesn’t need to be. Try other open source browsers like Lighting, which can view most modern sites and are just better made and don’t feel clunky and slugish.
The day they announced vpn services I dropped from Firefox. Because now its going to be more expensive for them. And they did more since then.
Where is the demand for ai on Firefox?
One thing I’ll give Facebook credit for in the case of content moderation is, Facebook is not decentralized like the Fediverse compared to on Lemmy, Misskey or Mastodon and etc.
Facebook has a whole centralized platform to moderate with all users. Compared to the Fediverse this moderation can be tough and very expensive. Facebook would have to pay a lot of moderators.
There are some problems known to occur however
There are some things that can slip through but with all this ai training more companies are moving towards ai moderation over human moderation that should reduce moderation costs and their profitability.
Some content Facebook doesn’t seem to tackle unless a government complains to them, particularly if they know its something they know generates them money.