saze

Oh that’s perfectly fine then! Thanks for taking the load off my mind.

I have noticed this trend of whatever Israel is accusing others of perpetuating, it is usually heavily involved in itself.

Doesn’t matter what is easier or the numbers involved. Fact is power lies in the money spent by millions funneled to a dozen, making them so potent. Millions don’t even need to change their ways, even a significant minority can start making bottom lines bleed like a mf.

Fantastic! Thanks for putting in the legwork with the correction.

Great question! It sent me into a Google frenzy and here is what I found.

Q3 to me means three month period from 1st July to 30th September. During this time, there were 20 Starlink ‘V2 mini’ and 2 ‘V1.5’ launches. Each ‘V2 mini’ mission contained 21-23 satellites, which I averaged to 22, and ~50 in each ‘V1.5’ mission. Further, each ‘V1.5’ satellite weighs in at 306kg and each ‘V2 mini’ weighs in at 800kg.

Phew! With all that out of the way, putting all that together ((20×800×22)+(2×306×50)), we arrive at a figure of 382,600kg. Uncannily, this is almost exactly the same as the figure reported in the graphic, and of course there were a lot more Falcon 9 launches in the intervening period, leading me to believe the reported tonnage figure excludes Starlink satellites. See edit below.

This is all napkin maths done in the middle of the night, please feel free to (gently!) correct me if needed.

Inevitable correction: Q3 (as defined above) saw only one non-Starlink related Falcon 9 launch (source), therefore ~99.6% of reported tonnage was Starlink related!

These projectiles get more advanced and deadly by the day.

Hot take but I blame gamers stuffing the pockets of these sort of publishers by lapping up early access and pre orders. It gives publishers no incentive whatsoever to change their ways because they still have the only thing they truly care about: money.

Elaborate please.

And likewise.

I was wondering when the braindead momo crowd would show up.