User's banner
Avatar

Settolino 𓁣

setto@fed.dyne.org
Joined
46 posts • 13 comments

Sono malandrino, chiamami settolino!

Resident tone architect at dyne.org 🌋 Think & Do tank. Multidisciplinary humanoid currently based in Stockholm. Music is my kind of jazz. Bring your spraycans to the aperitivo, fam. 🥂

https://setto.basspistol.org

Direct message

Finanical gain was never the purpose of Spotify. What spotify provides is the closest channel we know to monitor human emotions. The ability to corelate this data with all the other data gathered from social networks and search engine is well worth the loss.

https://thebaffler.com/downstream/big-mood-machine-pelly

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think the modality of spotify is ok, but the model could be very different. In exemple, imagine if you payed 10$ month, but instead of those being distributed across all of spotify statistically, they where divided and distrubuted to the author YOU actually listened to, on a monthly basis.

Maybe one month you only listened to 10 songs, so 1$ for each song author that month.

Of course, there should be a cut for the platform from that monthly fee, after all they have maintenance and administrative costs. And perhaps it should also take into account how much of a song you listened to, down to the second.

This is not a new model, but it is not an interesting one for venture capitalist funds, because it is too egalitarian. It is up to us to create it.

“To have a fair music market, there needs to be a fair market”.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the sun. or a blackhole. even if they’re mad evil, aliens don’t deserve this punishment

permalink
report
parent
reply