x00z

It isn’t animal abuse, it’s perfectly possible.

This is misinformation. Please add a source for the study.

I really dislike that guy. I was interested in his website but lost interest because of him. I already forgot why I started disliking him. But this just adds to that.

Yep exactly. A vegan diet is perfectly possible.

But I’m not here to discuss that. I’m here to discuss how this admin this abused their powers.

The article claims that they didn’t care about the possible profits of Twitter.

These investors would have either made money trough indirect means (keeping the eyes of the world off their shady stuff), or would use it to get a lot more power (think of misinformation strengthening their regimes) and many other tactics.

When these big boys play this game, there often isn’t a 1:1 relation.

Sure buddy.

This rogue admin was absolutely not acting with the best intentions. Is he kicked out of the admin team?

He was abusing the term “misinformation” even though it was extremely obvious that he had a personal vendetta against vegans. A vegan pet diet is perfectly possible, and vegans were merely saying that. There was no question for a source by anybody, because the source is just a simply google search away.

This admin is just anti vegan and was on a personal vendetta. He saw an opportunity to classify it as misinformation, so he just started removing posts and banning people. Why was /c/Vegan specifically targeted by this person?

“Oh but this vegan diet for your pet might hurt it!!”, bro you’re literally the one paying others to slaughter living beings.

You should have said “sure buddy” and ignored them.

My hopes were up when opening this thread as I hoped it would have been completely plantbased. Too bad.

Giving Elon 500 million to make billions seems like a good deal.