You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
82 points

I didn’t want to believe it but they’re already in the comments. We need to be vocal. Kamala is a great candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
148 points

‘Beating the Republican Fascist agenda’ is a great candidate. I don’t really care how that is spelled on the ballot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I’ll vote for virtually anyone the Democrats nominate to stop the genocidal dictator, but my first choice, of course, will always be-

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s my main deciding point, and why I’m happy Biden stepped down. I didn’t think he’d win the Rust Belt. Harris might.

My main vote is “Not Trump’s Fascism.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I will absolutely vote whoever is opposite of trump on the ticket. But a black woman winning the rust belt? That would be wild. I’m all for it, mind you, but that would be some crazy shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Trump kept climbing the polls in PA, which is the Keystone state of this election.

I’m not sorry, and I will be here all night.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Of course they are. They started when it was just rumored that Biden would drop out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Of course they are. It’s infuriating. Even the “anyone but trump” idiots undermines confidence in Kamala.

permalink
report
parent
reply

How is she a good candidate? She stood against everything progressives stand for as a prosecutor and hasn’t apologized or clarified that she supports marijuana legalization, abolition of for-profit prisons, or disproportionately prosecuting minorities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

I get that you probably weren’t aware of her evolved stance on these things, but a single google search could have shown you that you were incorrect on every single point you made.

permalink
report
parent
reply

And I’m happy to be wrong about her evolved state. Thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I love this site

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

Has she done those things? (I sincerely don’t know.)

I’ve heard that she’s revised her stances, but even in 2019 there was some question regarding the sincerity of her evolving viewpoints.

We’re likely to get 8 years of her if she wins, so I think it’s entirely reasonable to want her to affirm her stances in some of these areas. We won’t be able to move any further left than she allows. Sure, she’s not Trump, and I’m going to vote for her. It would be nice to have hope she’ll do more than just move right more slowly than Trump though.

She says very little, and nothing convincing, about some of the most serious charges against her, like that she fought hard to keep innocents in prison and failed to fight hard against corrupt cops.

If elected president, Harris seems as likely as any of her Democratic rivals, and far more likely than Donald Trump, to pursue a criminal-justice-reform agenda that overlaps with policies I favor as a civil libertarian. And I do not hold it against Harris that as a municipal and state official she enforced many laws that I regard as unjust. All the candidates now running for president will, if elected, preside over the enforcement of some laws that they and I regard as unjust.

But like her rivals, the reforms that Harris would sign into law as president would depend mostly on what Democrats in Congress could get to her desk. Far more important is how she would preside over a federal legal system and bureaucracy that is prone to frequent abuses. And her record casts significant doubts about whether she can be trusted to oversee federal law enforcement, the military, intelligence agencies, the detention of foreign prisoners, and more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/aug/01/were-tulsi-gabbards-attacks-kamala-harris-record-c/

Harris “put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.”

Notably, the figures dropped dramatically during Harris’ tenure, from 817 marijuana-related admissions in her first year in office to 137 in her last.

She laughed because it was funny and I’m tired of people telling me it’s not. 💥 🔫

She’s been a prosecutor, senator, and now VP. She has the experience. She can speak in complete sentences. She is a neo-liberal but that was a given. All Democratic candidates since Clinton have been neo-liberals. The idea that Kamala is anti-progressive is false.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah it is ridiculous. Essentially “why didn’t you legalize marijuana when you were AG?” Because that job isn’t about changing the laws it’s about prosecuting the law.

Bad enough SCOTUS is changing laws on a whim (instead of interpreting which is their actual job) we shouldn’t be expecting everyone on every level just disregard laws they disagree with. I agree that marijuana criminalization is stupid and should be repealed, but push for legislators to change the law rather than push for more people to ignore the law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Are you new to the democratic party?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Let me ask you a question: Harris Or Trump?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Harris, 100% I was wrong about the statement. She evolved her stance and has grown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-79 points

If she she’s was a great candidate she would have been the candidate 4 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

She was on the ticket 4 years ago. She is VP. Now she’s on top. Kamala 2024!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

I’m concerned you couldn’t grasp that by candidate we were talking about the Presidential candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

So she hasn’t gained any knowledge or experience in the last 4 years? We’re all just born with all the knowledge and experience we will ever have?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Honestly, doubt it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Fuck ooooffffffffff my god these flippant bullshit one liners get so old

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Dear god, please tell me this isn’t the best you people can come up with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Funny that’s what I say when I hear Harris is gonna be the candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If you’d applied this logic to trump would have even posted this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Wha… what? What does that even mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

By the same token, Biden was tied for dead last in the 2008 primary. Things change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s an interesting factoid, but I haven’t been able to find it anywhere. Do you have a source on that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

She’s an adequate candidate for the task at hand, which is beating Trump. Biden no longer is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

That’s far from a assured. She has a ton of issues on her own.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments