Oh cool, so they’re mixing their 2008 (racism) and 2016 (sexism) campaign strategies together.
Funny how many -isms come out in the media every time people don’t agree with the establishment line.
That legitimate debate is impossible while the media is hyper-focused on everything but. That’s exactly why reporting on racism exploded after occupy came dangerously close to threatening the banker’s cartel.
When the headlines are about random maga types being quoted calling her “little whore” and n-words - it’s clear that yeah, the -isms are indeed out and about, the media is just reporting it.
The reality cannot be denied, they aren’t deep faking the clips.
The maga crowd dosnt counter her policies, her voting record, her career, her speech, her age, her cognitive function
They go after what she was born with and what that crowd has been indoctrinated to hate.
That’s where the ism’s come from.
Funny how many -isms -ists come out
in the media
every time people don’t agree with the establishment line.
Edit: I realized I wasn’t very clear.
I will ask you what I asked the person you are agreeing with here: Is calling Kamala Harris the N-word just not agreeing with “the establishment line?” Because that’s what this is about.
Are you actually suggesting that calling her the N-word is simply disagreeing with the establishment line?
