Some Republicans are starting to seriously regret Donald Trump’s vice presidential nominee, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance.

It’s been only one week since Vance was nominated at the Republican National Convention, and already his own party members are expressing severe doubts about Trump’s pick. The former president’s allies have acknowledged that nominating Vance was the product of Trump’s absolute certainty that he would be able to defeat Joe Biden in November. While Vance wouldn’t do much for swing voters or independents, he would likely shore up support among Trump’s base.

But ever since Biden passed the torch to Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party’s new presumptive nominee, Republicans have begun to sour on Vance.

“The road got a lot harder. He was the only pick that wasn’t the safe pick. And I think everyone has now realized that,” one House Republican told Axios Thursday, under the condition of anonymity.

Another House Republican told Axios that Vance “doesn’t add much.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
228 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
46 points

i adore that he will live out the rest of his days being known as j.d. the couch fucking mascara muffin man vance

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I fully disagree. He’s only getting mocked for that because he’s a “manly man” who would surely criticize others for similar things. And punish anyone who isn’t cis. No one (surely some exceptions but a very small percentage) mocking him for this would ever do so if he weren’t like that.

And I don’t agree that it’s fair game to repeat a made up lie because it’s supposedly funny. That’s what Republicans do.

After watching Lemmy spout conspiracy theories galore minutes after the trump shooting and also not give a single shit about this “funny meme” being false, it’s really got me questioning if the left is any smarter than the right. Something I have taken for granted for decades. It’s depressing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

your cause is noble, but the outrage over mascara man vance bashing is misguided. “punching down” is insulting race, sexuality, gender, disability, and any other thing that no one chooses for themselves*. makeup is 100% a choice, for everyone. in vance’s example it’s a ridiculous choice, given the requisite strictly defined GOP persona of the “manly man,” which obviously doesn’t involve men wearing makeup. so vance will be mocked for it.

where’s the outrage over making fun of trump’s orange spray tan? guliani’s hair dye leaking forehead?

and if you’re going to bring “gendered insult” into the conversation, then exactly who is arguing under the flawed premise that mascara is just for women, if not the person calling the insult gendered?

don’t worry, i make fun of many, many choices people make, from cartoonishly huge pickup trucks, to cargo shorts

*edit: apparently “punching down” is generally defined to mean attacking people ‘less powerful’ than yourself. i’m still including unchosen circumstances in my usage

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

What we should do is praise them for normalizing makeup for men.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

It’s not about mocking someone who wears eyeliner, it’s about mocking someone who wears eyeliner and pretends they don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

no matter how we spin it or couch it

👀

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m sorry but Couch-fucker McGuy-Liner is way too good not to use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No, we’!re talking about the asshole who has plenty of real things to criticize without lowering ourselves to Republican-level antics by repeating random lies from some idiot’s Twitter account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just do the real stuff like his dolphin fetish!

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

More cushion for the pushin!

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Again, there is ZERO evidence that JD Vance has reached earth-shattering orgasm in the loving embrace of a two-piece sectional, or that he has had a wild fling or two with wicker outdoor patio furniture. NONE. He certainly has not done so while making disgusting claims about gay people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is probably how furries became popular. People saw that Monty Python skit about the mice men and thought it was funny and started dressing up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Richard Gere’s gerbil approved

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Live action bigmouth confirmed, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

JD “Nothing finer than a sofa recliner” Vance

permalink
report
parent
reply
188 points

The sectional predator himself

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Holy fuck, thank you for that laugh

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

“I did not have sectional relations with that sofa”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’d be hilarious if a whisper campaign about couch-fuckin’ is what stopped fascism…

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

He prefers the term Furniture Fondler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Does JD fuck couches? A lot of people are saying it. The best people. They keep saying it so there must be some truth to it. Just the other day I asked him so you prefer leather, right? It’s so smooth. It’s durable. It’s perfect! He looked me dead in the eye and said, “polyester”. It’s so rough though! That’s why he needs the glove!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think he’s a natural pairing with Donald Trump, the rapist. They can bring one girl back home without it getting “weird.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I’m late to the party. What’s up with all that couch fucking?

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Made up is just another way to say republikkklown speak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Ok that’s pretty fucking funny. Has anybody already made R34 of that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You can build a million bridges, but you fuck one single couch, no one calls you a bridge builder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hey there’s no proof of that!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 450K

    Comments