Shapiro’s position on Isreal isn’t any different than any of the other candidates.
I doubt it. There isn’t a politician in the country that candons flag burning and defacing public property.
Why do you guys keep assuming it’s some generic nothingburger rather than looking up the actual complaints?
I’d spend more time on a response to someone that doesn’t make bad faith arguments and supports genocide.
For you, though? No.
Nope, but serving in the IDF, and having some vocal opinions on the campus protests in favor of Palestine is just the thing Harris doesn’t need to be saddled with.
Walz is a low risk, medium reward pick. Shapiro is reverse. Can’t win the Presidency without Pennsylvania. I think the jabber that the far left came up with regarding Shapiro is shameful and embarrassing, but the choice is made and it’s time to move forward.
I think you’ll be surprised by the number of surprise states going blue for this election. A lot has happened since 2020 on Trump’s side, and none of it has been good.
I don’t think Shapiro guarantees PA. His approval is good, but it’s not crazy high like Beshear. And his vulnerabilities make him too risky of a pick, you don’t want to halt the positive momentum and alienate the young voters you have finally gotten energised.
Yeah, but you celebrate the genocide. I know you post a lot so the arguments between us from months ago will be far back in the history, but there is nothing surprising about someone who justifies genocide siding with the candidate who served in the military that is currently committing genocide.
Wouldn’t the opposite of a low risk, medium reward pick a high risk, medium reward pick?
