The Democratic National Committee’s virtual roll call vote has closed, and the Democratic Party announced that Vice President Kamala Harris received the votes of 99% of the participating delegates.

In a statement late Monday, Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison and Minyon Moore, the Democratic National Convention committee chair, said that the roll call results would next be certified by the convention’s secretary, Jason Rae, formalizing Harris’ status as the Democratic nominee who will take on Republican nominee Donald Trump in November.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
44 points

It isn’t.

We don’t live in a democracy. We live in a representative democracy. You have no direct say in your national leadership, even in the general election.

I’m not defending the DNC here. I’m not a huge fan of Harris but she’s better than Biden. I think they made the right choice but they could have easily made a fucking awful one, and there would be nothing anyone could do about it.

That a private, non representative organization just gets to hand pick our candidate is weird, and you’re right to be pissed about it. The way to change that is to start an organization to petition the government to move away from primaries and caucuses and towards a better method (someone will insist it’s ranked choice but I’m not convinced that’s the best method.)

We have two parties, until that changes this is the fucked up, idiotic system we’re stuck with. We’re stuck with Harris or Trump and if you’re on the fence between those two, I might recommend voting for the one who hasn’t raped a bunch of kids on a private island, bankrupted three casinos, and tried to overthrow the fucking government. But you do you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I might recommend voting for the one who hasn’t raped a bunch of kids on a private island, bankrupted three casinos, and tried to overthrow the fucking government.

Something about Harris doesn’t seem quite white. - Racists

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

bankrupted three casinos, two casino holding companies, and a Manhattan Hotel [1] but he’s an excellent businessman who will run America like his business [2]

[1] https://www.thoughtco.com/donald-trump-business-bankruptcies-4152019

[2] https://www.vox.com/2017/5/18/15653808/donald-trump-james-comey-michael-flynn-business

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

someone will insist it’s ranked choice but I’m not convinced that’s the best method.

Why not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It heavily favors moderates. No one, or at least very rarely will anyone get their first choice. But the least offensive candidate will be a lot of people’s second or third choice. There’s no functional reason it would lead to more than two parties, and doesn’t do anything to break up the big two we already have. You just have more candidates from each party running.

So you end up with a race towards milquetoast, be the least offensive. Be everybody’s second choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 387K

    Comments