You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
280 points

Step 1. Fire Boeing.

Step 2. Fucking FUND NASA.

Step 3. NASA builds space stuff that works.

permalink
report
reply
96 points

To be fair, some work has always been outsourced.

Like the o rings…

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Dark 😮

permalink
report
parent
reply

Damn man… Fuckin’… oof…

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I like my humor like I like my NASA space vehicles - outsourced to the lowest bidder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Boeing was the most expensive bidder for this program.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Too soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

NASA contracting stuff to space X has probably be the most amazing and sound financial decision they have made.

People on this website are so biased because Elon runs it but he genuinely built one of the most amazing companies in the world. Government including the US are miles behind them and struggling to play catch up and they are only trying because Space X has become so much better than them they have to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

It’s arguably not even him that it really running it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-42 points

Don’t care. He built the company, he’s the face of it. People hate the company and live in a dreamland where it’s failing because they want what Elon owns to be shit.

It isn’t and they are wrong because they can’t see past their bias.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Seems like he’s more involved with starship now than falcon or dragon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s not just blind hate for Elon, they’re genuinely terrible stewards of the environment in south Texas. They constantly lie about their intentions and impact to avoid having to take responsibility for anything. Say what you will about how independently they operate from his input, this is definitely a company culture that he cultivates and promotes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1823378186836889699

CNBC updated its story yesterday with additional factually inaccurate information.

While there may be a typo in one table of the initial TCEQ’s public version of the permit application, the rest of the application and the lab reports clearly states that levels of Mercury found in non-stormwater discharge associated with the water deluge system are well below state and federal water quality criteria (of no higher than 2.1 micrograms per liter for acute aquatic toxicity), and are, in most instances, non-detectable.

The initial application was updated within 30 days to correct the typo and TCEQ is updating the application to reflect the correction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Those are valid points. The people that actually know even small amounts about the company do have interesting insights.

But I wasn’t talking about those people. I was talking about people that see the name Elon and immediately “know” the company is in a shambles, failing and can’t keep up with the competition and all other sorts of nonsense based on no facts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The news story you are linking was incorrect and based on a typo in a report.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

People on this website are so biased because Elon runs it but he genuinely built one of the most amazing companies in the world

Elon didn’t build it. They literally have a manager whose entire job is to make sure Elon doesn’t get too close to the technical stuff because he’ll break it with some random order to change it for no reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Ah yes, the CCM: “CEO Childcare Manager”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I read quite a bit about how spacex was formed, including the book that obviously will tell the hero tales of Elon. But I’ve never seen any mention of this and would like to learn more. Would you be able to share a link?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No it was the engineers not Elon who built Space X up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Step 4. NASA builds planes that work (on the side).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

If BASA build aircraft they would have to throw it all away at the end of the flight.

Need better funding but they absolutely shouldn’t be building spacecraft, they are too scared of getting yelled at to innovate, and innovation is required.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Their idea of building a new rocket is by reusing as much of the 1970’s shuttle tech as they can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

1

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

s/Fire/Nationalize/

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They tried being more actively involved with the Aries I and Aries V rockets, but they got really bogged down to the point where Obama started commercial crew. Aries V eventually evolved into SLS, but with low capability and a very long schedule. And for better or for worse, SLS is getting lots of funding.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares_I https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Crew_Program

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I’ve worked for several aerospace companies including Boeing. I have nothing but contempt and hatred for Boeing and couldn’t get out of there fast enough. Management is garbage, safety comes second to schedule, people are treated like disposable cogs, but I would trust Boeing over NASA. I work with a lot of NASA and ex-NASA people right now on a couple major projects. Dear god NASA upper management makes me want to put my head through a wall! The insufferable sense of superiority trying to tell us “how things are done”. Bro, how is SLS coming? That’s what I thought, shut your mouth and stop pretending like you are the Apple of space systems. Luckily, most of the ground level people at NASA are more down to earth (pardon the puns) and easier to work with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We need to support and upgrade sls

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do we? It’s already years behind schedule, billions over budget, and doesn’t really have a use beyond Artemis. Also, the Exploration Upper Stage (one of the major planned upgrades) is being developed by… Boeing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

YES

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 508K

    Comments