You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
26 points

Because of nuclear non-proloferation treaties. You can’t run a “recycling” program without also being able to make plutonium for bombs.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

Just let the government do it then. All nuclear waste should/must be handled and recycled by the state.

It’s not like they don’t have nuclear bomb or plutonium already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Nahh duck that. Give 50 billion to some corporation to do the job.

Trust me bro, it works every time to make some dude rich

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Add the ‘/s’ for the libertarians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You can’t run a “recycling” program without also being able to make plutonium for bombs.

But you need far more enrichment for weapons grade plutonium than you do for commercial fuel plutonium. In fact, the more we use plutonium for fuel, the less nuclear waste there will be available to potentially be recycled into weapons grade plutonium in the future. There would also be less potent waste to be stored long term which is why Japan reprocesses.

And other countries are reprocessing, including Russia and China, so I don’t see how US holding back is helping non-proliferation anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Videos

!videos@lemmy.world

Create post

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don’t be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 2.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments