3 points
Lmao, the article is literally talking about children under the age of 10
-2 points
*
1 point
*
Well, your comment was generic of all ages. Not saying something along the lines of “16 year olds are intelligent enough to vote”, which I would agree with.
We can just just lower the 18 to 16 and resume the same conversation. No need to be condescending, you’re turning a misunderstanding into a disagreement
-2 points
1 point
1 point
*