You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
11 points

A privacy law that only works for paying customers? I think we can do far better than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The economic reality is not everything can be free for everyone. Privacy is the price people pay to have “free” access to services.

But right now, even those who pay to skip ads or have additional features on a service are still being mined for data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I deny your economic reality. There is no reason social media needs to charge. It can be run purely on volunteers and donations. It may not be able to be as big as FB but that is okay. We don’t need giant multimedia companies running social media anyways.

We need strong privacy protections for everyone, not just paying customers. It is time to put an end to targeted advertising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We’re talking about video hosting here. For a hosting site like YouTube that’s several petabytes of new storage added every day assuming no duplicates or backups of anything, plus the bandwidth, overhead, staffing, and more.

A project of that scale can’t be done by volunteer hobbyists with no money. What you’re asking for is for other people to work and spend billions annually without any expectation of compensation for just your entertainment, and you aren’t entitled to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 264K

    Comments