You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points
*

I do respect it, and the implicit value action it causes. Enjoy your vote, both on paper, and in consequence.

I recommend reading about game theory in outcome constrained systems.

Also, as sprinkles and toppings:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna742696

For non link clickers:

From 2015:

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

I do respect it, and the implicit value action it causes. Enjoy your vote, both on paper, and in consequence.

Oh, I will, thank you! I respect and support your right to vote for who you want to as well.

And that photo has been around a long time, and doesn’t bother me at all. It does nothing to change my mind.

Plus, it’s already been covered and addressed in a newsweek article:

https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-ties-vladimir-putin-explained-1842620

I’m still happy and proud to vote for her. :).

And for the record, I don’t hate Russia as much as people in this community do. I know that fact may wind some people up, but it’s the truth. We are still a country based on freedoms of opinion, and there is no law that says I HAVE to hate Russia or it’s people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Nobody hates Russia, they hate Putin, and his regime. Aside from Jill that is.

Edit the point is the dinner itself represents no wing doing, but as the article mentions it’s about the company you keep.

Similar to this , since you like Newsweek:

https://www.newsweek.com/photo-trump-epstein-resurfaces-after-jd-vance-fox-news-1941065

If you really think stein is on the level after such interactions and social proximity, then that’s the most telling thing about your choices so far.

And if not Putin, Michael fucking Flynn is there which also speaks to the character of the crowd

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

She explained why she was there. And I have no issues with her. So no, I don’t think she’s working for or with Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 449K

    Comments