You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
15 points

Why are we looking at revenue? We don’t know the operating costs. What are the profit margins?

permalink
report
reply
24 points

According to Wikipedia, in 2022 Elsevier’s revenue was 2.909 billion pounds and their net income was 2.021 billion pounds.

Not going to bother looking up the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There’s a much more accurate stat… and it’s disgusting

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Alright but look at how much they pay the authors. What other business pays ZERO dollars for their core product?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

None, but science isn’t a business. Treating it so creates perverse incentives where an articles is reviewed by merit of its financial gain and not its content. Some people already do this by prestige alone, but adding money to the mix won’t improve this imo

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So it’s acceptable for Elselvier et al to milk academics blind? At the minimum, authors should not be charged.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 84K

    Comments