702

Becoming et al.(mander.xyz)

posted
by
Avatar
fossilesque@mander.xyzM
in
Avatar
science_memes@mander.xyz
35 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
6 points
*

Literally even a spot bumped out on the end where they list everyone, at the very end of the paper, would be infinitely better than “et Al”

Uhhhhhh

Yeah I have no defense for this other than having a dumb moment.

Carry on… please

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
MBM@lemmings.world
8 points

It sounds like you’re talking about the references, which already list all authors

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Comment105@lemm.ee
1 point
*

Then what’s the issue? Sounds to me like papers already have comprehensive credits.

Is the issue that it’s displayed in two places, so people don’t bother to check out the second?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
thevoidzero@lemmy.world
15 points

That’s what bibliography is. It’s already like that, or am I missing something?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 87K

    Comments

Community moderators