You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
305 points

For those who don’t care to read the full article:

This basically just confines any cookies generated on a page, to just that page.

So, instead of a cookie from, say, Facebook, being stored on site A, then requested for tracking purposes on site B, each individual site would be sent its own separate Facebook cookie, that only gets used on that site, preventing it from tracking you anywhere outside of the specific site you got it from in the first place.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
*

Disabling cross site cookie is already a thing for decades…

Same with Do Not Track requests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Disabling cross site cookies and allowing them to exist while siloed within the specific sites that need them are two different things.

Previous methods of disabling cross site cookies would often break functionality, or prevent a site from using their own analytics software that they contracted out from a third party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thank you for your explanation, tbat greatly clears up my confusion.

TBH, if a person’s concern is being tracked by, for example, Facebook; then this just lets Facebook continue tracking them without directly allowing Facebook’s anaylitics customers to track them to another site directly (but indirectly that information can still be provided). But I guess for all the people giving FB and Google those proviledges better to have this than not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Do Not Track has never really done anything, it just asks websites politely to not track you. There’s no legal or technical limitation here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I still much rather have it than not. It also lead to the spiritual successor GPC which does actually have regulatory requirements under the CCPA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Isn’t this basically Firefox’s version of the third party cookie block that Chrome rolled out a few months ago? Or am I missing something here?

I mean, it’s good news either way but I just want to know if this is somehow different or better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Sites are much more contained now. Is much more like a profile per site.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t know why this wasn’t the case long ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It increases implementation complexity of the browser and loses people who fund Firefox and contribute code $$$

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

For those who don’t care to read the full article

Or even the whole title, really

permalink
report
parent
reply
202 points

Hahahahaha so it doesn’t break anything that still relies on cookies, but neuters the ability to share them.

That’s awesome

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

From my experience, blocking 3rd party cookies in general doesn’t seem to make any difference for site functionality anyways. Though I never log into sites with a Google or FB account other than Google or FB sites (and rarely at all for the latter).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Unless that cookie was somehow important for you to use both sites, but thats incredibly rare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I would love to see an icon of a neutered cookie please 🥺😄.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points
*

Honestly, I thought that’s how it already worked.

Edit: I think what I’m remembering is that you can define the cookies by site/domain, and restrict to just those. And normally would, for security reasons.

But some asshole sites like Facebook are cookies that are world-readable for tracking, and this breaks that.

Someone correct me if I got it wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Total Cookie Protection was already a feature, (introduced on Feb 23st 2021) but it was only for people using Firefox’s Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) on strict mode.

They had a less powerful third-party cookie blocking feature for users that didn’t have ETP on strict mode, that blocked third party cookies on specific block lists. (i.e. known tracking companies)

This just expanded that original functionality, by making it happen on any domain, and have it be the default for all users, rather than an opt-in feature of Enhanced Tracking Protection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

They’ve been doing this with container tabs, so this must be the successor to that idea (I’m going to assume they’ll still have container tabs).

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Basically creates a fake VM like environment for each site.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments