You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
13 points
*

I prefer the Jimmy Wales version of authority. The project operates democratically, but Jimmy always retains the ultimate authority to act as a sovereign at the end of the day because he built it, has the reputation of the project to protect, and it’s his legacy. The option to fork the project will always be there if the people want new leadership.

Setting aside the blithe just-fork-it-ism and the insult to the people who actually write the articles… Isn’t Wales just one of a dozen people on the Wikimedia Foundation board of trustees now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

also, isn’t this congruent to how Iran works?

Ayatollah Jimmy has some zazz, admittedly

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 502

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators