Will more funding be needed to keep Intel competitive?

On 1 August 2024, Intel announced financial results for the second quarter of 2024. They weren’t pretty; the company’s stock dropped more than 25 percent as it announced an aggressive plan to cut costs, including layoffs that will impact 15 percent of its entire workforce.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
27 points

Intel’s current CEO is Pat Gelsinger, he’s an engineer who was the chief architect of the i486.

It’s not just who’s at the top, the issue is that the company has gotten too big. There’s a reason why AMD with such a lower staff count has managed to leapfrog Intel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There’s a reason why AMD with such a lower staff count has managed to leapfrog Intel.

Jim Keller was a pretty big reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Intel had Jim Keller, and then Jim Keller left prematurely because of political infighting within Intel.

He could barely get anything done and was blocked all the time, because people thought his longer term goal was to become Intel’s next CEO.

His Royal Core project, which looked promising, has been cancelled by Pat Gelsinger.

Intel had a goose that laid golden eggs, killed it, then threw all the eggs they had into a volcano.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Intel had such a huge competitive lead during AMDs Bulldozer debacle. I assumed they were still making internal advancements and just sitting on them since there wasn’t any need to push the envelope while they had basically no competition.

Now I’m wondering if they did the typical US corporation thing of laying off their actual talent and using their obscene profits from this period for bonuses for their corporate officers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I suspect Intel has a broader product range than AMD to justify the headcount, but I’m not sure where the extra resources should go.

Their networking chipsets were gold-standard in the 100M and Gigabit era, but their 2.5G stuff is spotty to the point Realtek is considered legit.

They’ve pulled back from flash, SSDs and Optane.

There must be some other rich product lines that they do and AMD doesn’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

AMD doesn’t have fabs, and contracts that work out to TSMC. Intel has fabs worldwide. That alone makes Intel a much more capital-intensive, labor-intensive business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There’s a reason why AMD with such a lower staff count has managed to leapfrog Intel.

AMD just makes the designs and farms out manufacturing. Intel has to make the designs and manufacture the chips themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That should be an advantage for Intel, yet here we are

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 505K

    Comments