You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

they are uniquely dogshit for a lot of reasons.

The established centuries of lore made them dogshit, for sure, but considering their origins as Macross veritech where they were awesome there, I’d love to see them made good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

LAMs themselves are really good units, but they cost so much BV that you can get the same thing by just taking a bunch of fast hovertanks or a bunch of 7/11/7 mechs. The thing is right now CGL doesn’t really want to do anything with LAMs until they go and redo the aerospace rules, which the aerospace rules themselves are really bad, sorta…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

LAMs are brutal for back-shotting everything in BattleTech Advanced. Ton for ton, a bunch of medium LAMs can utterly obliterate units twice their size and quickly, but if one of them loses their evasion counters for any number of reasons, it’s smoked pretty much instantly. High risk, high reward.

permalink
report
parent
reply

games

!games@hexbear.net

Create post

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

  • No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don’t care if it’s ironic don’t post comments or content like that here.
  • Mark spoilers
  • No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
  • No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
  • No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 50K

    Comments