You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
10 points

holy shit, imagine getting a second chance to not be a fucking debatelord and doubling down this hard

off you fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

People just out here acting like a fundamentally, inextricably unreliable and unethical technology has a “use case”

smdh

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

fucking right! there’s this unearned assumption that just because the tech’s been invented, it must have worth. and, like, no? there’s so many dead ends in science and technology, and notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature

and now I’m pissed and trying to decide if it’s even worth explicitly adding “don’t be a debatelord asshole” to the TechTakes sidebar, cause it’s not like they’re gonna stop

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature

to wildly abword a phrase I’ve seen elsewhere: “idiocy can remain solvent longer than you can”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“We’re not saying it doesn’t have its flaws, but you need to appreciate the potential of the radium cockring!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

phallusy fallacy: posting like a cock

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 503

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators