You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-58 points

And this is why Kamala would have never won a primary and has given exactly one unscripted interview since being handed the nomination without the public’s say

The question was asking for specific ways she would lower prices 🙃

She has no platform, other than vague “read into what you want” platitudes and serving corporate donors

Make sure to vote for Harris though because Trump.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

A person can find legit criticisms, but a 50k tax credit for small businesses is not serving corporations. Neither really is expanding the child tax credit or down payment assistance for first time homebuyers.

If you’re going to criticize someone, make it factual, eh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

As a candidate, she can’t just come out and say it’s already being worked on. It’s already in the news anyway. Any answer here would have been attacked in the same way.

“The FTC already has cases against some of the largest corporate monopolies in this country”

“We’re investigating collusion of the largest conglomerate companies producing our food staples.”

“The companies who are raising these prices are using anti-competitive measures to ensure prices stay inflated, and we’re already working to ensure this stops.”

All of these answers are exactly things that have been said before, and nobody cares. It does move the needle. She is giving answers that will hopefully move the needle. This is politicking on a national level, not a town hall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

Did you watch the clip of her answer? https://x.com/PatTheSocialist/status/1834812242937643081

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes, but my response still explains whatever untoward thing you think is happening.

I’m going to say something that I don’t mean to be dismissive or insulting to you, because you and I exchanged words plenty around here, and I like that you bring some non-echoey content around. I appreciate you for that…but…

You can’t expect any real candidates who want to win to be an open book. This is US politics. Even the people you may find to be a moral center on some issues will still have to fudge the facts or give non-answers that ramble on in order to appeal to an absolutely monumental widening gap of groups of people who are becoming more and more siloed off in their beliefs and stances. Just because Harris is better than Trump, you can’t expect to get all the other bullshit out of the way and get an open book candidate. Any person running who claims to be totally truthful is lying, and anyone who thinks they are the best of the best is an idiot. The appeal needs to be for the widest audience you can muster, or it’s over.

Not every meal you eat is going to the best, or even better than the last, but you’ll deal. At this point in time in the election arena, Harris is what we have against a terrible, terrible alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

return2russia

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 384K

    Comments