You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
89 points

Not that I think it was a good reason for ditching them whatsoever, but one of the main reasons given has a tiny bit of merit:

Allegedly, a lot of users often cheaped out on SD cards and then used them as adopted system storage where they moved all their apps to. This had the effect of completely tanking phone performance and then they would often get corrupted after a bit of use taking user data with them. This then generated a load of negative reputation about the devices being slow and unreliable, when the problem was the choice of SD card, and generated a load of wasted money in supporting these users when that happened (think unnecessary RMAs, etc).

Personally I think they should just have restricted it to A1+ SD cards, and sucked up the people complaining about their bargain bin Scrandrisk SD not working. But I guess they saw an opportunity to have their cake and eat it by just removing it and charging a premium for larger storage skus.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Question is rather: why does Android not allow any distinction between Internal and external/removable?

My downloaded media files belong on the SD card, but APKs, sqlite DBs and temp files don’t belong there. But de facto, it’s just used as an extension for internal storage. That’s just stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

it does, or at least older versions of Android did

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Sometime around android 9 they removed a bunch of sd card related features to make you have to do the weird combine with internal storage thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How did you miss the opportunity to use scamdisk instead?

permalink
report
parent
reply

In nature, sometimes the shittiest design is still successful

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That very much isn’t the case beyond like a decade+ ago. For the last decade its been not possible, or extra work to install apks on sd card. The choice is there, but it’s far from default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

There is a UFS-II specification and even a PCIe version specifically for micro SD cards. It was all planned out, and it would have been trivial to tell consumers: “Yo need card with more contacts as shown in picture”. But no, the biggest manufacturer of flash storage is samsung, and they decided they’d rather sell higher storage capacity phones as a premium. Easy to do when you’re the second biggest manufacturer of of phones and apple already paved the way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I literally never heard or read about a user say that when using an sd card. They just took it out to charge more for more storage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s not the users saying it, it’s the OEMs. Back when this was a new discussion, I at least remember Google saying this as justification for why it stopped including them in their devices after the nexus 4

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, that was a lie to justify screwing over their users.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 264K

    Comments