If I was just complaining about border skirmishes, then I’d mention India or something. The attack on Vietnam was more than just a “minor border skirmish”.
1 point
Well, feel free to explain how the attack on Vietnam constitutes an occupation. Are you suggesting China’s military action was carried out with the intent of annexing a part of Vietnam?
Come on, you’re more well-read than this. You know that military occupation and annexation are not the same thing.
2 points
You still haven’t answered what you think the intent of the military action was. Do you claim any military confrontation is occupation?
