As Hurricane Helene careened toward Florida’s Panhandle, numerous Republicans voted against extending funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

Last week, Congress approved $20 billion for FEMA’s disaster relief fund as part of a stopgap spending bill to fund the government through December 20. But the measure left out billions of dollars in requested supplemental disaster funding.

The Senate approved the measure by a 78-18 vote on September 25 after it passed the House in a 341-82 vote. Republicans supplied the no votes in both chambers.

Some of the Republicans who voted against the bill represent states that have been hard hit by Helene, including Florida Representative Matt Gaetz.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-18 points

The reason they voted against it is because alot of other things where bundled in the bill. Congress should put forth a bill for FEMA funding only so that they could help people

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Clever, here’s what you sound like

Well, ackshually *shidding noises*

Reply once more for more thought provoking debate

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

debate is boring though, bloodsports is more exciting

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Be more specific

What was bundled with it specifically that was bad?

I’m willing to bet the bundling of other items (If any) were relevant items

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It was mainly more money for Ukraine, but now they’re saying stuff about FEMA spending money on illegal migrants or something along those lines (which is not true)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

wait until you figure out that literally every funding bill for everything has earmarked funding in basically every category.

It’s also not uncommon to push through a large monolithic funding bill since it’s simply easier than managing like 12 different pieces of legislation instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Not necessarily about this bill in particular but I hate the bill bundling bullshit in general. Sometimes the bill appears to be about something I care about but in the bill is a ton of irrelevant stuff that sometimes I absolutely hate. I wish this wasn’t able to work like this it’s deceptive on purpose

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Agreed, especially because lobbyists will get shit that otherwise wouldn’t pass to be bundled in the bill. One example is the infrastructure bill and all the non-infrastructure related stuff they put in there

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How can someone check what else was in this h bill? Genuinely curious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nice try. But no.

I bet that the amount of singular bills getting passed through both the house and senate that has spent money on helping common citizens is close to nil in the past decade.

There is no scenario in which what you describe is the reasoning for the bill getting voted against, especially by republicans.

You’re reasoning feels like gymnastics to make republicans look good as you don’t have an easy argument to make.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They bundle things into bills all the time to make the other side vote on them or look like the bad guy, by using the American citizen as hostage. I wonder why so little bills passed on helping the common man. I’m not taking the Republicans side here but it’s not black and white. Everyone’s reply to the concept of why the Republicans blocked it has been doubt, and it seems the “only” plausible explanation is that they’re all being petty and want to blame democrats for the failed FEMA response.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 484K

    Comments