You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
19 points

I can make a safe assumption before reading the article that ChatGPT didn’t ruin the wedding, but rather somebody that was using ChatGPT ruined the wedding.

permalink
report
reply
33 points
*

“blame the person, not the tools” doesn’t work when the tools’ marketing team is explicitly touting said tool as a panacea for all problems. on the micro scale, sure, the wedding planner is at fault, but if you zoom out even a tiny bit it’s pretty obvious what enabled them to fuck up for as long and as hard as they did

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

what if the person in question is also a tool

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

oh gods they’re multiplying

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

why would you say something so inane my god

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

do you think they ever got round to reading the article, or were they spent after coming up with “hmmmm I bet chatgpt didn’t somehow prompt itself” as if that were a mystery that needed solving

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I had to take a nap after my profound thoughts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

“ChatGPT is good, but only if no one in a position of authority uses it”

Cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

“This hammer can’t plan a wedding. Hammers are useless.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

almost all of your posts are exactly this worthless and exhausting and that’s fucking incredible

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 501

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators