You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-14 points

People keep saying this, but I’m not convinced our own brains are doing anything more.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

thinking is so easy to model when you don’t do it and assume nobody else does either

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

love these guys who clearly didn’t make it all the way to the end of the 250-word article

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
*

Let the haters hate.

Despite the welcome growth of atheism, almost all humans at one level or another cling to the idea that our monkey brains are filled with some magic miraculous light that couldn’t possibly be replicated. The reality is that some of us only have glimmers of sapience, and many not even that. Most humans, most of the time, are mindless zombies following a script, whether due to individual capacity, or a civilization that largely doesn’t reward metacognition or pondering the questions that matter, as that doesn’t immediately feed individual productivity or make anyone materially wealthier, that maze doesn’t lead to any yummy cheese for us.

AI development isn’t finally progressing quickly and making people uncomfortable with its capability because it’s catching up to our supposedly transcendental superbrains (that en masse spent hundreds of thousands of years wandering around in the dirt before it finally occurred to any of them that we could grow food seasonally in one place). It’s making a lot of humans uncomfortable because it’s demonstrating that there isn’t a whole hell of a lot to catch up to, especially for an average human.

There’s a reason pretty much everyone immediately discarded the Turing Test and basically called it a bullshit metric after elevating it for decades as a major benchmark in the development of AI systems… The moment a technology and design that could readily pass it became available. That’s the blind hubris of man on grand display.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

of course somebody prompted up a LessWrong-specific chatbot

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Creationists: We don’t understand the brain so it must be the work of god.

AI Worshipers: We don’t understand the brain so it must work exactly like LLMs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Banned for using the word metacognition seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

see I was just gonna go for “promptfondlin” but I’m glad I hesitated cause this is my new favorite ban reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I think I’ll start using “metacognition” in a derogatory way. What a metacognitive post.

The reality is that some of us only have glimmers of sapience, and many not even that.

Funny how all the people saying this always include themselves in the select few sapient ones.

Where does this NPC meme even come from? It’s one thing to think most people are stupid or conformist or susceptible to propaganda, but believing a large fraction of the population are “mindless zombies following a script” goes beyond simple arrogance to straight up delusion.

Yea, most people don’t think about some things I care about as deeply as I do. As if that means they don’t have their own internal life going on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

metacognition, n.: thinking as formulated by zuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

tell me more about the AI haters who work in AI research at Apple

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

I was referring to the downvotes of the comment I replied to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The reality is that some of us only have glimmers of sapience, and many not even that. Most humans, most of the time, are mindless zombies following a script

It’s a funny thing, that there are certain kinds of people who are assured of their own cleverness and so alienated from society that they think that echoing the same dehumanising blurb produced by so many of their forebears is somehow novel or informative, rather than just following a script.

(the irony of responding with an xkcd is not lost on me)

Much like the promptfondlers proudly claiming they are stochastic parrots, flaunting your inability to recognise intelligence in other humans isn’t a great flex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

How nice it must be to never ponder how large humanity is, and how each and every person you see outside has a full and rich interior and exterior world, and you that only see a tiny fraction of the people outside.

Personally one of my “oh other people are real!” moment, was when our parents (along with my sisters) took us on a surprise ferry trip to England (from France) and our grandparents that—at least as far as kid me remembered—we only ever saw in their home city, were waiting for us in Portsmouth, and we visited the city together (Portsmouth Historic Dockyard is quite nice btw).

I knew they were real, but realizing that they weren’t geo-locked, made me more fully internalize that they had full and independent lives, and therefore that everyone had.


How about people here? When did you realize people are real?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The reality is that some of us only have glimmers of sapience, and many not even that.

Choose your sneer answer:

  1. Wow, that’s not at all how a human brain should work, sounds like a serious medical condition, I would see a neurologist.
  2. Weird flex, but okay.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 502

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators