It’s a situation that I have been expecting for a while, but I wasn’t fully ready to accept it. Specifically it’s one of my LGBTQ friends who honestly believes in the democrats will protect them and their partner. I have tried to make the point that both parties are eroding any sort of civility towards all marginalized groups, but fear seems to drive them more than logical observations. They make the excuse that change doesn’t happen over night and that the left continues to grow and will have meaningful affects down the road. I fundamentally just don’t agree with that idea and vocalize it regularly. More and more it is ending up in a circular argument where I am painted as unrealistic and my rhetoric (leftist rhetoric) is doing more harm than good because it promotes distrust in the only system we have to work with. I try to tell them it’s kind of the whole point. We gotta start somewhere if we want to see a better, more representative system, but they are so hung up on the immediate future while simultaneously saying that my idealistic feelings are shortsighted and I cant expect change in the immediate future… The double-talk is wild, I know.
I am trying my hardest to stop from engaging at this point because on the most basic level we agree on a lot of stuff, but they are just way to wrapped up in the fear mongering of the democratic party. They know that the two party system is broken, they know that something drastic needs to change, but they also think that they are powerless to do anything except choose the lesser evil. It pains me because I am watching them do the same shit past generations have done, where they give up on their ideals for the sake of preserving the current status quo that they benefit from. I am legitimately watching them imply “fuck you, got mine” under the guise of civic duty and I hate it. I want nothing more than to be able to finally say “I told you so” without being a smug asshole about it and ruining our friendship.
Thanks for reading my rant. It’s probably a bit disjointed, but the frustration is boiling over and I needed to vent to the only group of people that seems to understand the hopelessness of being a disenfranchised leftist.
Trump did bad things. So have the Dems. And sincerely describing someone who actively supports genocide as “not perfect” just shows what a disingenuous lib you are. Your version of “harm reduction” has, for decades, done nothing but emphasize and prolong the harm.
I don’t live in the US either. I just care about people’s wellbeing in general. You should recognise that literally wherever on the planet you live, that organising and doing direct action would be more productive than telling people anywhere that voting matters. What a fucking waste of political energy.
I’m happy where my country stands at, thanks.
There it is. “I don’t care about anyone else, I like how my life is and want the status quo”. Do direct action and organise to help OTHERS, if your country is a super paradise then do direct action to pressure your government into condemning genocide. Sadly I think you won’t ever resort to actually doing something to help.
It’s not worth engaging, really. You clearly know all this and actually just don’t give a fuck.
I do care for people, hence why I’m writing here, in the hope of convincing even one person to vote the right person, since physically going there isnt feasible.
pressure your government into condemning genocide.
what if they already did? the US is such a huge economical power that no-one but themselves can push it towards a better future, and all the third party voters are doing is assuring that the genocide is gonna continue under Trump’s regime (since that’s basically what it is apparently, thank SCOTUS)
Based on the TLD of their instance, it’s even funnier for them to say that.
I’m happy where my country stands at, thanks.
The country is currently, according to you, on the tipping edge of something cataclysmic and you’re happy with that? Lmao
Right, so let’s elect the guy who will do imminent and immediate harm, and a lot more of it, because that’s better obviously
As opposed to the lady who will do imminent and immediate harm, but where dorks like you go outside and fight against it?
I am a realist. The genocide, at least for now, won’t stop, but we have the power to not make it worse. What do you chose?
You’ve been told quite a few times what people choose. A realist would accept the reality of the situation. A realist also wouldn’t have this idealistic dogmatic adherence to decades old arguments about “aw shucks just this one time we need to do it, because the other guy is actually way worse and way different”
In your case the realistic option would be to acknowledge that your candidate has a better chance of winning the election if she stops supporting a genocide, and instead of arguing with leftists online you put your energy towards pushing your candidate to make those concessions. What do you choose?
